Copertina

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Contact-Analog and Bounding Box Prototypes in Augmented Reality Head-Up Display Warning for Chinese Novice Drivers Under Various Collision Types and Traffic Density

Salvato in:
Pubblicato in:International Journal of Human - Computer Interaction vol. 41, no. 4 (Feb 2025), p. 2677
Autore principale: Chen, Wanting
Altri autori: Niu, Liuqiucheng, Liu, Shan, Ma, Shu, Li, Hongting, Yang, Zhen
Pubblicazione:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Soggetti:
Warning systems
Collisions
Augmented reality
Performance evaluation
Traffic volume
Head-up displays
Reaction time
Effectiveness
Prototypes
Subjectivity
Pedestrians
Distraction
Traffic
Critical events
Reality
Warnings
Density
Augmentation
Accesso online:Citation/Abstract
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
Abstract:Augmented Reality Head-Up Display (AR-HUD) is a promising solution to the current warning system distraction problem. However, how to effectively convey warnings through AR graphics is still unclear. This study examines the effectiveness of the contact-analog graphic compared to the bounding box graphic in various collision types and traffic densities. Forty-eight participants watched AR-augmented driving videos and were instructed to respond to critical events. Reaction time, response rate, and subjective evaluations were compared for rear-end and pedestrian collisions in different traffic densities under different warnings. Both bounding box and contact-analog warnings improved driving performance compared to the non-warning group. The contact-analog warning performed better for rear-end collisions, while the bounding box warning had a lower reaction time for pedestrian collisions, regardless of traffic density.
ISSN:1044-7318
DOI:10.1080/10447318.2024.2327197
Fonte:ABI/INFORM Global