Reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adult samples.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:bioRxiv (Feb 20, 2025)
Hlavní autor: Vidal-Pineiro, Didac
Další autoři: Sorensen, Oystein, Stromstad, Marie, Amlien, Inge K, Anderson, Micael, Baare, William Fc, Bartres-Faz, David, Brandmaier, Andreas M, Brathen, Anne Cecilie, Garrido, Pablo, Ghisletta, Paolo, Grydeland, Hakon, Henson, Richard N, Kievit, Rogier A, Korbmacher, Max, Kuhn, Simone, Ulman Lindenberger, Mowinckel, Athanasia M, Nyberg, Lars, Roe, James M, Sneve, Markus H, Sole-Padulles, Cristina, Leiv-Otto Watne, Walhovd, Kristine B, Fjell, Anders M
Vydáno:
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Témata:
On-line přístup:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3168897716
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2692-8205 
024 7 |a 10.1101/2024.06.03.592804  |2 doi 
035 |a 3168897716 
045 0 |b d20250220 
100 1 |a Vidal-Pineiro, Didac 
245 1 |a Reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adult samples. 
260 |b Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  |c Feb 20, 2025 
513 |a Working Paper 
520 3 |a In neuroimaging research, tracking individuals over time is key to understanding the interplay between brain changes and genetic, environmental, or cognitive factors across the lifespan. Yet, the extent to which we can estimate the individual trajectories of brain change over time with precision remains uncertain. In this study, we estimated the reliability of structural brain change in cognitively healthy adults from multiple samples and assessed the influence of follow-up time and number of observations. Estimates of cross-sectional measurement error and brain change variance were obtained using the longitudinal FreeSurfer processing stream. Our findings showed, on average, modest longitudinal reliability with two years of follow-up. Increasing the follow-up time was associated with a substantial increase in longitudinal reliability while the impact of increasing the number of observations was comparatively minor. On average, 2-year follow-up studies require ≈2.7 and ≈4.0 times more individuals than designs with follow-ups of 4 and 6 years to achieve comparable statistical power. Subcortical volume exhibited higher longitudinal reliability compared to cortical area, thickness, and volume. The reliability estimates were comparable to those estimated from empirical data. The reliability estimates were affected by both the cohort's age where younger adults had lower reliability of change, and the preprocessing pipeline where the FreeSurfer's longitudinal stream was notably superior than the cross-sectional. Suboptimal reliability inflated sample size requirements and compromised the ability to distinguish individual trajectories of brain aging. This study underscores the importance of long-term follow-ups and the need to consider reliability in longitudinal neuroimaging research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Footnotes* This version of the manuscript has been revised to update author names, general improvements in clarity* https://github.com/LCBC-UiO/Long_Brain_Reliability 
653 |a Neuroimaging 
653 |a Medical imaging 
653 |a Life span 
653 |a Estimates 
653 |a Brain research 
653 |a Aging 
700 1 |a Sorensen, Oystein 
700 1 |a Stromstad, Marie 
700 1 |a Amlien, Inge K 
700 1 |a Anderson, Micael 
700 1 |a Baare, William Fc 
700 1 |a Bartres-Faz, David 
700 1 |a Brandmaier, Andreas M 
700 1 |a Brathen, Anne Cecilie 
700 1 |a Garrido, Pablo 
700 1 |a Ghisletta, Paolo 
700 1 |a Grydeland, Hakon 
700 1 |a Henson, Richard N 
700 1 |a Kievit, Rogier A 
700 1 |a Korbmacher, Max 
700 1 |a Kuhn, Simone 
700 1 |a Ulman Lindenberger 
700 1 |a Mowinckel, Athanasia M 
700 1 |a Nyberg, Lars 
700 1 |a Roe, James M 
700 1 |a Sneve, Markus H 
700 1 |a Sole-Padulles, Cristina 
700 1 |a Leiv-Otto Watne 
700 1 |a Walhovd, Kristine B 
700 1 |a Fjell, Anders M 
773 0 |t bioRxiv  |g (Feb 20, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Biological Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3168897716/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.03.592804v2