Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges
Salvato in:
| Pubblicato in: | Administrative Sciences vol. 15, no. 2 (2025), p. 58 |
|---|---|
| Autore principale: | |
| Altri autori: | |
| Pubblicazione: |
MDPI AG
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3170834016 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2076-3387 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/admsci15020058 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3170834016 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231329 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Aldemir, Ceray |u Public Administartion Department, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Muğla, Türkiye | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Artificial Intelligence for Financial Accountability and Governance in the Public Sector: Strategic Opportunities and Challenges | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This study investigates the transformative capacity of artificial intelligence (AI) in improving financial accountability and governance in the public sector. The study aims to explore the strategic potential and constraints of AI integration, especially as fiscal systems become more complex and public expectations for transparency increase. This study employs a qualitative case study methodology to analyze three countries, which are Estonia, Singapore, and Finland. These countries are renowned for their innovative use of AI in public administration. The data collection tools included an extensive review of the literature, governmental publications, case studies, and public feedback. The study reveals that AI-driven solutions such as predictive analytics, fraud detection systems, and automated reporting significantly improve operational efficiency, transparency, and decision making. However, challenges such as algorithmic bias, data privacy issues, and the need for strong ethical guidelines still exist, and these could hinder the equitable use of AI. The study emphasizes the importance of aligning technological progress with democratic values and ethical governance by addressing these problems. The study also enhances the dialog around AI’s role in public administration. It provides practical recommendations for policymakers who seek to use AI wisely to promote public trust, improve efficiency, and ensure accountability in governance. Future research should focus on enhancing ethical frameworks and investigating scalable solutions to overcome the social and technical challenges of AI integration. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Estonia | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Singapore | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Finland | |
| 653 | |a Predictive analytics | ||
| 653 | |a Public services | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Public administration | ||
| 653 | |a Decision making | ||
| 653 | |a Transparency | ||
| 653 | |a Data analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Automation | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive ability | ||
| 653 | |a Public sector | ||
| 653 | |a Cognition & reasoning | ||
| 653 | |a Financial reporting | ||
| 653 | |a Efficiency | ||
| 653 | |a Accountability | ||
| 653 | |a Literature reviews | ||
| 653 | |a Policy making | ||
| 653 | |a Technological progress | ||
| 653 | |a Case studies | ||
| 653 | |a Privacy | ||
| 653 | |a Governance | ||
| 653 | |a Data collection | ||
| 653 | |a Feedback | ||
| 653 | |a Public finance | ||
| 653 | |a Fraud | ||
| 653 | |a Management | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Uysal, Tuğba Uçma |u International Trade and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Muğla, Türkiye | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Administrative Sciences |g vol. 15, no. 2 (2025), p. 58 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3170834016/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3170834016/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3170834016/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |