Cropland Loss Under Different Urban Expansion Patterns in China (1990–2020): Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Driving Factors, and Policy Implications

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:Land vol. 14, no. 2 (2025), p. 343
Autore principale: Mao, Chengrui
Altri autori: Feng, Shanshan, Zhou, Canfang
Pubblicazione:
MDPI AG
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3171082804
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2073-445X 
024 7 |a 10.3390/land14020343  |2 doi 
035 |a 3171082804 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231528  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Mao, Chengrui  |u Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; <email>mcr0707@163.com</email> (C.M.); <email>fengshanshan@gdaas.cn</email> (S.F.); Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510640, China 
245 1 |a Cropland Loss Under Different Urban Expansion Patterns in China (1990–2020): Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Driving Factors, and Policy Implications 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a It is well established that China’s rapid urban expansion has led to a substantial loss of cropland. However, few studies have examined how different urban expansion patterns contribute to cropland consumption, which has hindered the formulation of sustainable urban development and cropland protection policies. To fill this gap, we analyzed the occupation of cropland under three urban expansion patterns (leap-frogging, edge-spreading, and interior filling) in China from 1990 to 2020, using long-term land use data. The dominant driving forces of cropland loss were then explored using the XGBoost model and SHAP values. Our findings indicate that urban expansion in China from 1990 to 2020 resulted in a 6.3% reduction in cropland, with edge-spreading (4.0%) contributing the most, followed by leap-frogging (2.1%) and interior filling (0.2%). Change in urban intensity (CUI) proved to be the most critical driver of cropland loss, with SHAP values of 0.38, 0.28, and 0.37 for edge-spreading, leap-frogging, and interior filling, respectively. Over time, the driving forces evolved from a single demographic-economic dominance to a more diversified and integrated set of drivers. Based on these findings, we propose tailored planning and policies for different urban expansion patterns; for regions dominated by edge-spreading, stricter controls on urban boundaries and stronger land use planning constraints are required. For regions with prominent interior filling expansion, efforts should be made to improve internal land use efficiency while preserving existing cropland spaces. In regions characterized by leap-frogging expansion, further optimization of construction land allocation is needed to reduce the occupation of productive suburban cropland. These findings not only offer new empirical evidence for understanding the interplay between urban expansion and cropland conservation but also provide transferable insights that can inform sustainable land-use planning and cropland protection strategies in other rapidly urbanizing regions facing similar challenges. 
651 4 |a Tibetan Plateau 
651 4 |a China 
653 |a Agricultural land 
653 |a Datasets 
653 |a Spreading 
653 |a Policy and planning 
653 |a Biodiversity 
653 |a Population density 
653 |a Land use 
653 |a Environmental impact 
653 |a Urban areas 
653 |a Urban development 
653 |a Agriculture 
653 |a Computer centers 
653 |a Urban sprawl 
653 |a Precipitation 
653 |a Environmental economics 
653 |a Land use management 
653 |a Gross Domestic Product--GDP 
653 |a Crops 
653 |a Sustainable development 
653 |a Urbanization 
653 |a Land use planning 
653 |a Climate change 
700 1 |a Feng, Shanshan  |u Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; <email>mcr0707@163.com</email> (C.M.); <email>fengshanshan@gdaas.cn</email> (S.F.); Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510640, China 
700 1 |a Zhou, Canfang  |u Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; <email>mcr0707@163.com</email> (C.M.); <email>fengshanshan@gdaas.cn</email> (S.F.); Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in South China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510640, China 
773 0 |t Land  |g vol. 14, no. 2 (2025), p. 343 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Publicly Available Content Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171082804/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171082804/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3171082804/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch