Profiles of moral sensitivity and their associated factors in nursing students: A latent profile analysis
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Nurse Education in Practice vol. 84 (Mar 2025), p. 104314 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3187161189 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1471-5953 | ||
| 022 | |a 1873-5223 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104314 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3187161189 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250301 |b d20250331 | |
| 084 | |a 170342 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chao, Wen |u School of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Profiles of moral sensitivity and their associated factors in nursing students: A latent profile analysis | |
| 260 | |b Elsevier Limited |c Mar 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Aim This study was conducted to identify group profiles in moral sensitivity among Chinese nursing students and examine the factors associated with moral sensitivity subgroups. Background Moral sensitivity is a precondition for ethical decision making. Developing this sensitivity equips nursing students with the skills to identify and respond appropriately to ethical dilemmas, which are essential as they prepare to enter clinical settings. As integral members of the future nursing workforce, nursing students must be well prepared to navigate the ethical challenges they face. Design This study used a cross-sectional design. Methods Using convenience sampling, 716 nursing undergraduates from three universities in Jiangxi Province participated in this study. Participants completed online assessments of personality traits, empathy, professional nursing values and moral sensitivity. Latent profile analysis was used to identify moral sensitivity profiles and multinomial logistic regression was used to explore factors influencing distinct moral sensitivity profiles in nursing undergraduates. Results Results identified three profiles: “moral idealists” (9.7 %; high moral strength, moral burden; low moral responsibility), “moral undertakers” (32.0 %; moderate moral strength, moral burden; high moral responsibility), “moral skeptics” (58.3 %; low moral strength, moral burden and moral responsibility). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that grade level, only child status, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, empathy and professional nursing values were associated with different profiles of moral sensitivity in nursing students. Conclusion Most undergraduate nursing students were placed in the moral skeptics group; thus, educational institutions should pay special attention to nursing students with low levels of moral sensitivity. Particular attention and additional support should be given to nursing students who are only children, in their lower academic years, exhibit neurotic traits and possess lower levels of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Educational activities and programs that prioritize empathy and professional nursing values may present a viable approach to fostering moral sensitivity among nursing students. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Jiangxi China | |
| 651 | 4 | |a China | |
| 653 | |a Values | ||
| 653 | |a Questionnaires | ||
| 653 | |a Skepticism | ||
| 653 | |a Influence | ||
| 653 | |a Ethical dilemmas | ||
| 653 | |a College students | ||
| 653 | |a Emotional instability | ||
| 653 | |a Personal information | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing education | ||
| 653 | |a Personality traits | ||
| 653 | |a Personality tests | ||
| 653 | |a Workforce | ||
| 653 | |a Cross-sectional studies | ||
| 653 | |a Personality | ||
| 653 | |a Moral responsibility | ||
| 653 | |a Undergraduate students | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Empathy | ||
| 653 | |a Agreeableness | ||
| 653 | |a Nurses | ||
| 653 | |a Only children | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing care | ||
| 653 | |a Confidentiality | ||
| 653 | |a Decision making | ||
| 653 | |a Response rates | ||
| 653 | |a Sociodemographics | ||
| 653 | |a Variables | ||
| 653 | |a Conscientiousness | ||
| 653 | |a Regression analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical nursing | ||
| 653 | |a Attention | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical decision making | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Educational activities | ||
| 653 | |a Morality | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing | ||
| 653 | |a Children | ||
| 653 | |a Sampling | ||
| 653 | |a Profiles | ||
| 653 | |a Patients | ||
| 653 | |a Psychological Characteristics | ||
| 653 | |a Resilience (Psychology) | ||
| 653 | |a Sample Size | ||
| 653 | |a Participant Characteristics | ||
| 653 | |a Behavior Patterns | ||
| 653 | |a Moral Values | ||
| 653 | |a Psychological Patterns | ||
| 653 | |a Decision Making Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Online Surveys | ||
| 653 | |a Informed Consent | ||
| 653 | |a Value Judgment | ||
| 653 | |a Response Rates (Questionnaires) | ||
| 653 | |a Nursing Students | ||
| 653 | |a Student Surveys | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Wen |u School of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, Yingyin |u Gannan Health Vocational College, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Luo, Qing |u School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Chunqin |u School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xiao, Jiajian |u Finance Division of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511436, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yin, Ling |u Department of Hepatological Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Nurse Education in Practice |g vol. 84 (Mar 2025), p. 104314 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Sociology Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187161189/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187161189/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187161189/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |