Exploring pedagogical approaches in crown preparation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of instructional videos and live demonstrations
-д хадгалсан:
| -д хэвлэсэн: | BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 |
|---|---|
| Үндсэн зохиолч: | |
| Бусад зохиолчид: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Хэвлэсэн: |
Springer Nature B.V.
|
| Нөхцлүүд: | |
| Онлайн хандалт: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Шошгууд: |
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3187549447 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1472-6920 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07060-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3187549447 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 58506 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Maria Shakoor Abbasi | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Exploring pedagogical approaches in crown preparation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of instructional videos and live demonstrations | |
| 260 | |b Springer Nature B.V. |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Evidence Based Healthcare Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of instructional videos and live demonstrations in crown preparation training for preclinical dental students.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted over 12 months with 96 final-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students. Participants were randomly allocated into three groups: Group A (instructional video), Group B (live demonstrations), and Group C (hybrid approach). Each group underwent training in porcelain-fused-to-metal tooth preparation through their respective methods. Performance was assessed using a standardized scoring chart, while satisfaction and perceptions were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and paired t-tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsThe group comparisons revealed significant differences in perceptions between Group A and Group B regarding stress levels during crown preparation (p = 0.013) and the adequacy of preclinical training (p = 0.034), with Group B showing higher satisfaction. However, no significant differences were found between Groups A and C or between Groups B and C (p > 0.05). Exercise scores across all groups showed no significant variation (p > 0.05), indicating comparable performance. Knowledge assessment revealed that while a majority of students correctly identified key concepts such as finish line depth, bur choices, and cusp reduction, 10–16% of students held misconceptions in areas like margin design and reduction ranges.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that instructional videos, live demonstrations, and a hybrid approach are all effective methods for teaching crown preparation skills to preclinical dental students. The slight advantage of the hybrid approach suggests that combining different teaching methods may provide the most comprehensive learning experience. Future studies should explore the long-term impact of these methods on clinical performance.Trial registrationThe study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06426095. | |
| 653 | |a Prosthodontics | ||
| 653 | |a Pedagogy | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a Teaching methods | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical medicine | ||
| 653 | |a Video recordings | ||
| 653 | |a Intervention | ||
| 653 | |a Skills | ||
| 653 | |a Medical research | ||
| 653 | |a Clinical trials | ||
| 653 | |a Dentistry | ||
| 653 | |a Informed consent | ||
| 653 | |a Education | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Quality | ||
| 653 | |a Teacher Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Patients | ||
| 653 | |a Experiential Learning | ||
| 653 | |a Video Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Graduate Students | ||
| 653 | |a Lecture Method | ||
| 653 | |a Educational Methods | ||
| 653 | |a Sample Size | ||
| 653 | |a Randomized Controlled Trials | ||
| 653 | |a Student Participation | ||
| 653 | |a Dental Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Visual Aids | ||
| 653 | |a Outcomes of Education | ||
| 653 | |a Recruitment | ||
| 653 | |a Visualization | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Anis, Ayesha | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Billoo, Sarah | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Altamash, Sara | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ambreen Afzal Ehsan | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Syed Ahmed Omer | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ilhan, Duygu | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Zarak | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Naseer, Ahmed | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Das, Gotam | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Seyed Ali Mosaddad | |
| 773 | 0 | |t BMC Medical Education |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Healthcare Administration Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187549447/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187549447/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3187549447/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |