Rehability and vahdity in Quahtative Research Revisited and the Role of AI
Guardado en:
| Udgivet i: | The Qualitative Report vol. 30, no. 3 (Mar 2025), p. 3306 |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Udgivet: |
The Qualitative Report
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3193732382 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1052-0147 | ||
| 022 | |a 2160-3715 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.46743/2160-3715/2025.7523 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3193732382 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250301 |b d20250331 | |
| 084 | |a 113910 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Christou, Prokopis A |u Cyprus University of Technology | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Rehability and vahdity in Quahtative Research Revisited and the Role of AI | |
| 260 | |b The Qualitative Report |c Mar 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The evolving nature of research and the integration of new technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), introducé new challenges and threats, necessitating a re-examination of the key criteria of reliability and validity. In this paper, I revisit these concepts in the context of quahtative research, highlighting their evolving meanings and significance. I begin by defining reliability and validity and explaining their importance. Following this, I discuss strategies for establishing these criteria within quahtative studies and offer guidelines for maintaining rigor in the current research landscape. While emphasizing the need for human oversight, intervention, and interpretation, I underscore how to ensure trustworthiness in quahtative research outcomes amidst technological advancements. | |
| 653 | |a Research methodology | ||
| 653 | |a Validity | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Research | ||
| 653 | |a Data collection | ||
| 653 | |a False information | ||
| 653 | |a Ethics | ||
| 653 | |a Qualitative research | ||
| 653 | |a Influence of Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Language Processing | ||
| 653 | |a Credibility | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t The Qualitative Report |g vol. 30, no. 3 (Mar 2025), p. 3306 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Sociology Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3193732382/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3193732382/fulltext/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3193732382/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch |