Computational Precedent-Based Instruction (CPBI): Integrating Precedents and BIM-Based Parametric Modeling in Architectural Design Studio

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Buildings vol. 15, no. 8 (2025), p. 1287
Hlavní autor: Alassaf Nancy
Vydáno:
MDPI AG
Témata:
On-line přístup:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3194534532
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2075-5309 
024 7 |a 10.3390/buildings15081287  |2 doi 
035 |a 3194534532 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231437  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Alassaf Nancy 
245 1 |a Computational Precedent-Based Instruction (CPBI): Integrating Precedents and BIM-Based Parametric Modeling in Architectural Design Studio 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Architectural design education aims to balance creativity and analytical thinking. However, design studios have traditionally emphasized intuitive approaches over systematic processes. This study developed and evaluated a pedagogical model termed Computational Precedent-Based Instruction (CPBI), which integrates precedent-based instruction with BIM-based parametric modeling in the architectural design studio. The research explored CPBI’s impact on students’ design skills, identified perceived benefits and challenges, and assessed its effectiveness in promoting systematic design thinking. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining model-based inquiry and quasi-experimental research. It involved 19 third-year undergraduate architecture students in a 14-week design studio course. Data collection utilized pre–post surveys, external experts review of student work, and observational data. The pedagogical intervention focused on developing architectural forms, defining aesthetics, and refining building programs using the works of the New York Five architects as precedents. The results showed statistically significant improvements in students’ self-reported design competencies, particularly in precedent analysis, principle application, and design articulation. A shift towards more structured design reasoning was evident. The CPBI model provides a systematic framework for extracting and applying design knowledge from precedents, bridging the gap between conceptual design thinking and digital tools. It contributes to repositioning BIM as an integral design environment in the early design stages, offering implications for both architectural education and professional practice. 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Pedagogy 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Experimental research 
653 |a Modelling 
653 |a Interdisciplinary aspects 
653 |a Architecture 
653 |a Computer applications 
653 |a Statistical analysis 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Cognition & reasoning 
653 |a Design analysis 
653 |a Design thinking 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a Knowledge based engineering 
653 |a Creativity 
653 |a Rationality 
653 |a Designers 
653 |a Building information modeling 
653 |a Comparative analysis 
653 |a Design education 
773 0 |t Buildings  |g vol. 15, no. 8 (2025), p. 1287 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194534532/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194534532/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3194534532/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch