Studying state violence through an embodied approach: methodological reflections

Sparad:
Bibliografiska uppgifter
I publikationen:Geographica Helvetica vol. 80, no. 2 (2025), p. 123
Huvudupphov: Devran Koray Öcal
Utgiven:
Copernicus GmbH
Ämnen:
Länkar:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Taggar: Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3195340478
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0016-7312 
022 |a 2194-8798 
024 7 |a 10.5194/gh-80-123-2025  |2 doi 
035 |a 3195340478 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 263028  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Devran Koray Öcal  |u Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 
245 1 |a Studying state violence through an embodied approach: methodological reflections 
260 |b Copernicus GmbH  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This paper explores the methodological complexities of investigating state violence in Türkiye's Kurdish regions through an embodied approach. This perspective involves exploring the perceptions, thoughts, emotions, and institutional practices and cultures of police and military personnel. Conducting embodied research with individuals who may be perpetrators of state violence necessitates addressing numerous methodological challenges. First, I discuss the procedural intricacies of obtaining permission from state authorities to engage with the security bureaucracy. Second, I examine how to construct a conversation setting where participants feel both comfortable and un-threatened throughout the interview, while also enabling me to delve into their perceptions, emotions, and perspectives – insights that are essential for interpreting the dynamics underpinning the emergence of state violence. Finally, I reflect on how the challenges of conducting such research manifested in my own embodied experiences as a researcher, addressing my fears, ethical dilemmas, and the advantages and concerns I perceived regarding my appearance and positionality. The overarching aim of this study is twofold: to advance scholarly discussions on methodological approaches to exploring contentious subjects such as state violence, geographies of killing, and necropolitics and to provide practical guidance for navigating critical methodological challenges – including field access, ethical considerations, and ensuring the safety of both researchers and participants – when conducting research in complex and high-risk contexts. 
651 4 |a Turkey 
653 |a Violence 
653 |a Research methodology 
653 |a Ethnography 
653 |a Authoritarianism 
653 |a Ethics 
653 |a Bureaucracy 
653 |a Kurdish people 
653 |a Military personnel 
653 |a Sociopolitical factors 
653 |a Field study 
653 |a Embodiment 
653 |a Political violence 
653 |a Research 
653 |a Methodological problems 
653 |a Biopolitics 
653 |a Emotions 
653 |a Methodological approaches 
653 |a Armed forces 
653 |a Ethical dilemmas 
653 |a Perceptions 
653 |a High risk 
653 |a Perpetrators 
653 |a Permission 
653 |a Killing 
773 0 |t Geographica Helvetica  |g vol. 80, no. 2 (2025), p. 123 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Social Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3195340478/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3195340478/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3195340478/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch