MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3201524596
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07212-9  |2 doi 
035 |a 3201524596 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Al-Jayyousi, Reem 
245 1 |a Investigating the learning value of early clinical exposure among undergraduate medical students in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a IntroductionThe benefits of Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) in medical education are often stated but there is limited evidence on how to effectively maximize its learning value. The challenge for medical educators lies in finding ways to enhance the quality of ECE in alignment with students’ feedback, while realizing the learning outcomes. The purpose of this study is to investigate undergraduate medical students’ perception of an innovative ECE intervention in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, developed using design-based research in alignment with adult, experiential learning theories.MethodsA convergent mixed methods study design was utilized. The data was collected using a tailormade survey to solicit both quantitative and qualitative feedback. Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS. Qualitative data analysis was inductive based on constructivist epistemology. Following the conclusion of the independent data analyses of the quantitative and qualitative datasets, the primary inferences were integrated using the iterative joint display analysis process.ResultsOut of the 68 students who attended the ECE, 54 responded. The percentage of the total extent of agreement that the ECE: familiarized them with learning in the clinical environment and brought forth the institutional values were 79.60% and 86.43%, respectively. The extent of active engagement and self-directed learning, with a mean of 6.80(2.42), was significantly associated with how much the learners reaped from the learning experience (P < 0.05). A novel conceptual model, namely: ‘Early Clinical Exposure Added Value’, with five interconnected themes, was developed from the qualitative analysis. Integration of findings led to six meta-inferences: Embeddedness in context of learning, System perspective, Patient-centricity, Theory–practice link, Resilience, and Proactiveness.ConclusionThe more medical students engage in their learning, the more ECE contributes to building their academic resilience, and propels them in terms of clinical correlations, skills’ development, and values reinforcement. Securing engagement opportunities for the learners, when designing and planning for the ECE, is essential. Optimizing the ECE learning value can happen systematically through continuously developing the respective intervention in alignment with the principles of design-based research and anchoring it in constructivism experiential learning theories. 
651 4 |a Middle East 
651 4 |a Dubai United Arab Emirates 
651 4 |a United Arab Emirates 
653 |a Medical education 
653 |a Teaching methods 
653 |a Adult students 
653 |a Patient-centered care 
653 |a Intervention 
653 |a Adult learning 
653 |a Medical personnel 
653 |a Medical students 
653 |a Cognition & reasoning 
653 |a Experiential learning 
653 |a Medical research 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Professionals 
653 |a Independent study 
653 |a Professional Training 
653 |a Educational Practices 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Inferences 
653 |a Learning Processes 
653 |a Academic Achievement 
653 |a Learning Theories 
653 |a Learning Experience 
653 |a Mixed Methods Research 
653 |a Health Personnel 
653 |a Adult Basic Education 
653 |a Environmental Influences 
653 |a Physician Patient Relationship 
653 |a Instructional Effectiveness 
653 |a Opportunities 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a Constructivism (Learning) 
653 |a Methods Research 
653 |a Human Relations 
700 1 |a Nour Abu Mahfouz 
700 1 |a Otaki, Farah 
700 1 |a Paulus, Agnes 
700 1 |a Czabanowska, Katarzyna 
700 1 |a Zaman, Qamar 
700 1 |a AlAshkar, Masa 
700 1 |a Stanley, Adrian 
700 1 |a Kilian, Paddy 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201524596/abstract/embedded/160PP4OP4BJVV2EV?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201524596/fulltext/embedded/160PP4OP4BJVV2EV?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3201524596/fulltextPDF/embedded/160PP4OP4BJVV2EV?source=fedsrch