Neurophysiological Approaches to Lie Detection: A Systematic Review
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Brain Sciences vol. 15, no. 5 (2025), p. 519 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3211925692 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2076-3425 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/brainsci15050519 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3211925692 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231436 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Taha Bewar Neamat |u Department of Software Engineering, Fırat University, Elazığ 23119, Türkiye; bewar_nemat@outlook.com (B.N.T.); | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Neurophysiological Approaches to Lie Detection: A Systematic Review | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Background and Objectives: Lie detection is crucial in domains such as security, law enforcement, and clinical assessments. Traditional methods suffer from reliability issues and susceptibility to countermeasures. In recent years, electroencephalography (EEG) and particularly the Event-Related Potential (ERP) P300 component have gained prominence for identifying concealed information. This systematic review aims to evaluate recent studies (2017–2024) on EEG-based lie detection using ERP P300 responses, especially in relation to recognized and unrecognized face stimuli. The goal is to summarize commonly used EEG signal processing techniques, feature extraction methods, and classification algorithms, identifying those that yield the highest accuracy in lie detection tasks. Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, restricted to English-language articles from 2017 to 2024. Studies were included if they focused on EEG-based lie detection, utilized experimental protocols like Concealed Information Test (CIT), Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), or Deceit Identification Test (DIT), and evaluated classification accuracy using ERP P300 components. Results: CIT with ERP P300 was the most frequently employed protocol. The most used preprocessing method was Bandpass Filtering (BPF), and the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) emerged as the preferred feature extraction technique due to its suitability for non-stationary EEG signals. Among classification algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) were frequently utilized. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of hybrid and deep learning-based models in enhancing classification performance. Conclusions: EEG-based lie detection, particularly using the ERP P300 response to face recognition tasks, shows promising accuracy and robustness compared to traditional polygraph methods. Combining advanced signal processing methods with machine learning and deep learning classifiers significantly improves performance. This review identifies the most effective methodologies and suggests that future research should focus on real-time applications, cross-individual generalization, and reducing system complexity to facilitate broader adoption. | |
| 653 | |a Physiology | ||
| 653 | |a Signal processing | ||
| 653 | |a Investigations | ||
| 653 | |a Law enforcement | ||
| 653 | |a Signal to noise ratio | ||
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Biometrics | ||
| 653 | |a EEG | ||
| 653 | |a Brain research | ||
| 653 | |a Pattern recognition | ||
| 653 | |a Classification | ||
| 653 | |a Magnetic resonance imaging | ||
| 653 | |a Pattern recognition systems | ||
| 653 | |a Polygraphs | ||
| 653 | |a Neurosciences | ||
| 653 | |a Event-related potentials | ||
| 653 | |a Nervous system | ||
| 653 | |a Methods | ||
| 653 | |a Deep learning | ||
| 653 | |a Neural networks | ||
| 653 | |a Learning algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Baykara Muhammet |u Department of Software Engineering, Fırat University, Elazığ 23119, Türkiye; bewar_nemat@outlook.com (B.N.T.); | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alakuş Talha Burak |u Department of Software Engineering, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli 39100, Türkiye | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Brain Sciences |g vol. 15, no. 5 (2025), p. 519 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Biological Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211925692/abstract/embedded/XH47U3ESDU1O47K5?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211925692/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/XH47U3ESDU1O47K5?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3211925692/fulltextPDF/embedded/XH47U3ESDU1O47K5?source=fedsrch |