Beyond traditional training: a comprehensive CIPP evaluation of medical internships: assessing program design, implementation, and clinical competency outcomes

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1
Autor principal: Yoshany, Nooshin
Otros Autores: Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad, Moradi, Leila, Sharma, Manoj
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3216559397
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07404-3  |2 doi 
035 |a 3216559397 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Yoshany, Nooshin 
245 1 |a Beyond traditional training: a comprehensive CIPP evaluation of medical internships: assessing program design, implementation, and clinical competency outcomes 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a AimInternship programs are important components of teaching and learning that provide medical students with opportunities for real-life learning. The study aimed at evaluating the internship program for students of xxx using the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, and Product).Materials and methodsA cross-sectional descriptive analysis was performed on 305 students and 15 faculty members of xxx. Data were collected using a questionnaire based on the CIPP model that developed by researchers. The internship program was evaluated in four areas: input, context, process and product from the perspective of students and faculty members. The scores obtained for each domain were analyzed using SPSS v.21.ResultsContext Evaluation: Significant stakeholder discrepancy (p < 0.001): 78% of students reported inadequate environmental needs assessment vs. 35% of faculty 72% students identified goal misalignment with clinical realities vs. 28% faculty. Input Evaluation: No significant difference (p = 0.32): Comparable ratings for resource adequacy (students: 4.1/6, faculty: 4.3/6) Similar perceptions of curriculum design quality. Process Evaluation: Major implementation gaps (p < 0.001): Supervision quality: Students 2.8/6 vs. Faculty 4.7/6 Feedback mechanisms: 65% student dissatisfaction. Product Evaluation: Strong CIPP domain correlations: Context→Input: r = 0.769 (p < 0.001). Context→Process: r = 0.733 (p < 0.001). Context→Product: r = 0.724 (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe design and implementation of evaluation programs based on the CIPP model may help improve internship programs and achieve students’ professional competencies. The positive and negative findings in this study should be considered by decision makers and healthcare officials when designing and implementing internship programs. Further longitudinal studies may be required to confirm these findings.Clinical trial numberNot applicable. 
653 |a Internships 
653 |a Educational evaluation 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Likert scale 
653 |a Medical students 
653 |a Efficiency 
653 |a Health care 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Clinical outcomes 
653 |a Medical education 
653 |a Program Design 
653 |a Learning Activities 
653 |a Educational Methods 
653 |a Scoring 
653 |a Likert Scales 
653 |a Internship Programs 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Communication Skills 
653 |a Educational Change 
653 |a Program Evaluation 
653 |a Decision Making 
653 |a Medical Evaluation 
653 |a Job Skills 
653 |a Check Lists 
653 |a Program Implementation 
653 |a Educational Objectives 
653 |a Research Tools 
653 |a Formative Evaluation 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Internal Medicine 
653 |a Educational Facilities Improvement 
653 |a Educational Strategies 
653 |a Resource Allocation 
700 1 |a Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad 
700 1 |a Moradi, Leila 
700 1 |a Sharma, Manoj 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216559397/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216559397/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216559397/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch