Assessing the Accuracy and Consistency of Cropland Datasets and Their Influencing Factors on the Tibetan Plateau
Spremljeno u:
| Izdano u: | Remote Sensing vol. 17, no. 11 (2025), p. 1866 |
|---|---|
| Glavni autor: | |
| Daljnji autori: | , , |
| Izdano: |
MDPI AG
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Oznake: |
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3217745940 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2072-4292 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rs17111866 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3217745940 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231556 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zhang Fuyao |u Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; zhangfuyao2414@igsnrr.ac.cn (F.Z.); xinlj@igsnrr.ac.cn (L.X.); lixb@igsnrr.ac.cn (X.L.) | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Assessing the Accuracy and Consistency of Cropland Datasets and Their Influencing Factors on the Tibetan Plateau | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a With advancements in cloud computing and machine learning algorithms, an increasing number of cropland datasets have been developed, including the China land-cover dataset (CLCD) and GlobeLand30 (GLC). The unique climatic conditions of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) introduce significant differences and uncertainties to these datasets. Here, we used a quantitative and visual integrated assessment approach to assess the accuracy and spatial consistency of five cropland datasets around 2020 in the TP, namely the CLCD, GLC30, land-use remote sensing monitoring dataset in China (CNLUCC), Global Land Analysis and Discovery (GLAD), and global land-cover product with a fine classification system (GLC_FCS). We analyzed the impact of terrain, climate, population, and vegetation indices on cropland spatial consistency using structural equation modeling (SEM). In this study, the GLAD cropland area had the highest fit with the national land survey (R2 = 0.88). County-level analysis revealed that the CLCD and GLC_FCS underestimated cropland areas in high-elevation counties, whereas the GLC and CNLUCC tended to overestimate cropland areas on the TP. Considering overall accuracy, GLC and GLAD performed the best with scores of 0.76 and 0.75, respectively. In contrast, CLCD (0.640), GLC_FCS (0.640), and CNLUCC (0.620) exhibited poor overall accuracy. This study highlights the significantly low spatial consistency of croplands on the TP, with only 10.60% consistency in high and complete agreement. The results showed substantial differences in spatial accuracy among zones, with relatively higher consistency observed in low-altitude zones and notably poorer accuracy in zones with sparse or fragmented cropland. The SEM results indicated that elevation and slope directly influenced cropland consistency, whereas temperature and precipitation indirectly affected cropland consistency by influencing vegetation indices. This study provides a valuable reference for implementing cropland datasets and future cropland mapping studies on the TP region. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Tibetan Plateau | |
| 651 | 4 | |a China | |
| 653 | |a Vegetation | ||
| 653 | |a Food security | ||
| 653 | |a Accuracy | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural land | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural production | ||
| 653 | |a Datasets | ||
| 653 | |a Elevation | ||
| 653 | |a Topography | ||
| 653 | |a Remote sensing | ||
| 653 | |a Remote monitoring | ||
| 653 | |a Land use | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 653 | |a Land cover | ||
| 653 | |a Climate change | ||
| 653 | |a Land surveys | ||
| 653 | |a Precipitation | ||
| 653 | |a Low altitude | ||
| 653 | |a Climatic conditions | ||
| 653 | |a Vegetation index | ||
| 653 | |a Temperature | ||
| 653 | |a Cloud computing | ||
| 653 | |a Classification | ||
| 653 | |a Regions | ||
| 653 | |a Impact analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural management | ||
| 653 | |a Crops | ||
| 653 | |a Plastic pollution | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xue |u Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; zhangfuyao2414@igsnrr.ac.cn (F.Z.); xinlj@igsnrr.ac.cn (L.X.); lixb@igsnrr.ac.cn (X.L.) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liangjie, Xin |u Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; zhangfuyao2414@igsnrr.ac.cn (F.Z.); xinlj@igsnrr.ac.cn (L.X.); lixb@igsnrr.ac.cn (X.L.) | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Xiubin |u Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; zhangfuyao2414@igsnrr.ac.cn (F.Z.); xinlj@igsnrr.ac.cn (L.X.); lixb@igsnrr.ac.cn (X.L.) | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Remote Sensing |g vol. 17, no. 11 (2025), p. 1866 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3217745940/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3217745940/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3217745940/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |