Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Hemodialysis Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Պահպանված է:
Մատենագիտական մանրամասներ
Հրատարակված է:Journal of Medical Internet Research vol. 27 (2025), p. e67246
Հիմնական հեղինակ: Xu-Hua, Zhou
Այլ հեղինակներ: Chen, Hui, Yang, Weiwei, Wang, Li, Chen, Lin, Zhu, Ying, Zhang, Yingjun, Shi, Mei, Zhang, Qin
Հրապարակվել է:
Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor
Խորագրեր:
Առցանց հասանելիություն:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Ցուցիչներ: Ավելացրեք ցուցիչ
Չկան պիտակներ, Եղեք առաջինը, ով նշում է այս գրառումը!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3222368172
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1438-8871 
024 7 |a 10.2196/67246  |2 doi 
035 |a 3222368172 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Xu-Hua, Zhou 
245 1 |a Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Hemodialysis Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 
260 |b Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background:Within hemodialysis patient populations, eHealth interventions have been considered as an alternative and complementary option to routine care services. However, the efficacy of eHealth interventions for hemodialysis patients remains poorly understood owing to a lack of rigorous quantitative evidence synthesis.Objective:This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of eHealth interventions in improving quality of life, treatment adherence, and psychological outcomes (anxiety and depression) among hemodialysis patients. In addition, the study sought to identify specific intervention components and methodological quality associated with enhanced quality of life and health outcomes in this population.Methods:A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China BioMedical Literature Database databases from their inception to September 7, 2024. Randomized controlled trials on eHealth interventions for hemodialysis patients published in English or Chinese were included. Critical appraisal was carried out independently by 2 reviewers to assess the bias risk of the studies included. Quantitative synthesis of the outcomes of interest was conducted using a random-effects model. The quality of evidence for the outcomes was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.Results:A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 1728 participants were included in this meta-analysis out of 5741 articles identified in the initial database search and additional search references. In the 17 studies, 8 kinds of eHealth intervention delivery formats were used, including text messages, telephone sessions, video, network platforms, social media, computers, websites, and mobile apps. The majority of research studies used a single form of eHealth intervention, and 7 studies adopted a combined approach of 2 or more eHealth technologies. The duration of eHealth interventions demonstrated substantial variability across studies, spanning from 4 weeks to 12 months, of which 3 months was the most common. A total of 14 (82%) studies were considered to have “some concern” about selection bias. In addition, 15 (88%) trials were classified as having a “high risk” of performance and detection bias, and all trials were judged to be at “low risk” of attrition and reporting bias. The pooled results revealed a significant difference between the eHealth interventions and control groups on quality of life (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.87, 95 % CI 0.38 to 1.37, low certainty evidence), treatment adherence (SMD=1.11, 95 % CI 0.30 to 1.91, moderate certainty evidence), anxiety (SMD=–2.11, 95 % CI –3.25 to –0.97, moderate certainty evidence), and depression (SMD=–2.46, 95 % CI –3.68 to –1.25, moderate certainty evidence).Conclusions:eHealth interventions could be a beneficial approach for improving quality of life and treatment adherence and reducing anxiety and depression among hemodialysis patients. However, future high-quality randomized controlled trials are essential to draw more reliable conclusions.Trial Registration:PROSPERO CRD42024589799; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024589799 
653 |a Hemodialysis 
653 |a Adherence 
653 |a Intervention 
653 |a Databases 
653 |a Attrition 
653 |a Science and technology 
653 |a Anxiety 
653 |a Telemedicine 
653 |a Chronic illnesses 
653 |a Risk assessment 
653 |a Health status 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Efficacy 
653 |a Clinical trials 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Dialysis 
653 |a Clinical outcomes 
653 |a Uncertainty 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Mental depression 
653 |a Quality of life 
653 |a Meta-analysis 
653 |a Social media 
653 |a Selection bias 
653 |a High risk 
653 |a Quantitative analysis 
653 |a Telephones 
653 |a Risk 
653 |a Registration 
653 |a Bias 
653 |a Social networks 
653 |a Medical research 
653 |a Patients 
653 |a Text messaging 
653 |a Treatment compliance 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Mental health services 
653 |a Psychological distress 
653 |a Biomedicine 
653 |a Video recordings 
653 |a Medical treatment 
700 1 |a Chen, Hui 
700 1 |a Yang, Weiwei 
700 1 |a Wang, Li 
700 1 |a Chen, Lin 
700 1 |a Zhu, Ying 
700 1 |a Zhang, Yingjun 
700 1 |a Shi, Mei 
700 1 |a Zhang, Qin 
773 0 |t Journal of Medical Internet Research  |g vol. 27 (2025), p. e67246 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Library Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222368172/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222368172/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222368172/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch