Bacteriophages as a Biocontrol Strategy to Prevent the Contamination of Meat Products with Escherichia coli – a Meta-Analysis
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Polish Journal of Microbiology vol. 74, no. 2 (2025), p. 165 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , , , , |
| Publicado: |
De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3222966658 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1733-1331 | ||
| 022 | |a 2544-4646 | ||
| 022 | |a 0137-1320 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33073/pjm-2025-014 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3222966658 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250401 |b d20250630 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a IRACEMA ISLAS VEGA |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Bacteriophages as a Biocontrol Strategy to Prevent the Contamination of Meat Products with Escherichia coli – a Meta-Analysis | |
| 260 | |b De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Bacteriophage-based biocontrol is a cost-effective, sustainable strategy with low ecological impact, which can control the growth of bacteria such as Escherichia coli that impacts public health problems. This work aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the implementation of bacteriophages as a biocontrol strategy to prevent the contamination of meat products with E. coli. The search was performed by two field experts to avoid reviewer bias. The initial search identified 2,695 bibliographic sources, of which 2,480 were discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, which were the origin of phage, application method, phage taxonomy, E. coli pathotype and meat products, getting 157 articles because they were duplicates, and 47 because they lacked the necessary numerical data. Finally, 11 articles were selected for quantitative analysis. Likewise, phage characteristics (p < 0.05) and E. coli pathotype (p < 0.05), showed that the bacteriophage-bacteria ratio is an item that should be taken into account for the design of bacteriophage application strategies. This meta-analysis evaluates the use of phages in the reduction of E. coli in meat products, considering multiple methodological criteria. Studies were included that specify the origin of the phages (natural or modified), their method of application (direct in meat, in solution, in aerosol, etc.), their taxonomic classification, as well as the pathotype of the target E. coli (EHEC, ETEC, etc.). In addition, the different types of meat products were analyzed, including beef, pork, and chicken. These criteria help clarify the factors affecting phage therapy efficacy in the meat industry. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Mexico | |
| 653 | |a Health problems | ||
| 653 | |a Public health | ||
| 653 | |a Biological control | ||
| 653 | |a Meat products | ||
| 653 | |a Coliforms | ||
| 653 | |a Meat processing industry | ||
| 653 | |a Taxonomy | ||
| 653 | |a Phages | ||
| 653 | |a Meat industry | ||
| 653 | |a Food contamination | ||
| 653 | |a Effectiveness | ||
| 653 | |a Criteria | ||
| 653 | |a Meat | ||
| 653 | |a Meta-analysis | ||
| 653 | |a E coli | ||
| 653 | |a Contamination | ||
| 653 | |a Infections | ||
| 653 | |a Agronomy | ||
| 653 | |a Food safety | ||
| 653 | |a Pathogens | ||
| 653 | |a Food contamination & poisoning | ||
| 653 | |a Bacteria | ||
| 653 | |a Bibliometrics | ||
| 653 | |a Meat quality | ||
| 653 | |a Toxins | ||
| 653 | |a Economic | ||
| 653 | |a Escherichia coli | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a REYES RODRÍGUEZ, NYDIA EDITH |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a ACOSTA PÉREZ, VICTOR JOHAN |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a ANDREA PALOMA ZEPEDA VELÁZQUEZ |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a VICENTE VEGA SÁNCHEZ |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a JORGE LUIS DE LA ROSA ARANA |u Faculty of Higher Studies Cuautitlán, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Cuautitlán Izcalli, Estado de México, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a JESÚS BENJAMÍN PONCE NOGUEZ |u Mayan Faculty of Agricultural Studies, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Catazajá, Chiapas, Mexico | |
| 700 | 1 | |a FABÍAN RICARDO GÓMEZ DE ANDA |u Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Miguel Huatengo, Hidalgo, Mexico | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Polish Journal of Microbiology |g vol. 74, no. 2 (2025), p. 165 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Biological Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222966658/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3222966658/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch |