MDO of Robotic Landing Gear Systems: A Hybrid Belt-Driven Compliant Mechanism for VTOL Drones Application
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | Drones vol. 9, no. 6 (2025), p. 434-469 |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| מחברים אחרים: | |
| יצא לאור: |
MDPI AG
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| תגים: |
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3223896150 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2504-446X | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/drones9060434 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3223896150 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Kabganian Masoud | |
| 245 | 1 | |a MDO of Robotic Landing Gear Systems: A Hybrid Belt-Driven Compliant Mechanism for VTOL Drones Application | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This paper addresses inherent limitations in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) undercarriages hindering vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities on uneven slopes and obstacles. Robotic landing gear (RLG) designs have been proposed to address these limitations; however, existing designs are typically limited to ground slopes of 6–15°, beyond which rollover would happen. Moreover, articulated RLG concepts come with added complexity and weight penalties due to multiple drivetrain components. Previous research has highlighted that even a minor 3-degree slope change can increase the dynamic rollover risks by 40%. Therefore, the design optimization of robotic landing gear for enhanced VTOL capabilities requires a multidisciplinary framework that integrates static analysis, dynamic simulation, and control strategies for operations on complex terrain. This paper presents a novel, hybrid, compliant, belt-driven, three-legged RLG system, supported by a multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) methodology, aimed at achieving enhanced VTOL capabilities on uneven surfaces and moving platforms like ship decks. The proposed system design utilizes compliant mechanisms featuring a series of three-flexure hinges (3SFH), to reduce the number of articulated drivetrain components and actuators. This results in a lower system weight, improved energy efficiency, and enhanced durability, compared to earlier fully actuated, articulated, four-legged, two-jointed designs. Additionally, the compliant belt-driven actuation mitigates issues such as backlash, wear, and high maintenance, while enabling smoother torque transfer and improved vibration damping relative to earlier three-legged cable-driven four-bar link RLG systems. The use of lightweight yet strong materials—aluminum and titanium—enables the legs to bend 19 and 26.57°, respectively, without failure. An animated simulation of full-contact landing tests, performed using a proportional-derivative (PD) controller and ship deck motion input, validate the performance of the design. Simulations are performed for a VTOL UAV, with two flexible legs made of aluminum, incorporating circular flexure hinges, and a passive third one positioned at the tail. The simulation results confirm stable landings with a 2 s settling time and only 2.29° of overshoot, well within the FAA-recommended maximum roll angle of 2.9°. Compared to the single-revolute (1R) model, the implementation of the optimal 3R Pseudo-Rigid-Body Model (PRBM) further improves accuracy by achieving a maximum tip deflection error of only 1.2%. It is anticipated that the proposed hybrid design would also offer improved durability and ease of maintenance, thereby enhancing functionality and safety in comparison with existing robotic landing gear systems. | |
| 653 | |a Actuation | ||
| 653 | |a Maintenance | ||
| 653 | |a Adaptability | ||
| 653 | |a Powertrain | ||
| 653 | |a Systems design | ||
| 653 | |a Motion control | ||
| 653 | |a Unmanned aerial vehicles | ||
| 653 | |a Ship decks | ||
| 653 | |a Systems stability | ||
| 653 | |a Proportional derivative | ||
| 653 | |a Vibration damping | ||
| 653 | |a Stress concentration | ||
| 653 | |a Composite materials | ||
| 653 | |a Robotics | ||
| 653 | |a Vehicles | ||
| 653 | |a Aircraft | ||
| 653 | |a Design optimization | ||
| 653 | |a Simulation | ||
| 653 | |a Rollover | ||
| 653 | |a Multidisciplinary design optimization | ||
| 653 | |a Undercarriages | ||
| 653 | |a Durability | ||
| 653 | |a Weight reduction | ||
| 653 | |a Drones | ||
| 653 | |a Vertical takeoff | ||
| 653 | |a Compliance | ||
| 653 | |a Complexity | ||
| 653 | |a Flexing | ||
| 653 | |a Actuators | ||
| 653 | |a Landing gear | ||
| 653 | |a Drone aircraft | ||
| 653 | |a Aluminum | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hashemi, Seyed M | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Drones |g vol. 9, no. 6 (2025), p. 434-469 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223896150/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223896150/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223896150/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |