Augmented Reality in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Education Sciences vol. 15, no. 6 (2025), p. 678-702
Autor principal: Li Gege
Otros Autores: Luo Heng, Chen, Di, Wang Peiyu, Yin Xin, Zhang Jiakai
Publicado:
MDPI AG
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3223901725
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2227-7102 
022 |a 2076-3344 
024 7 |a 10.3390/educsci15060678  |2 doi 
035 |a 3223901725 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231457  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Li Gege 
245 1 |a Augmented Reality in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Augmented reality (AR) has been widely used in higher education because of its unique characteristics that combine virtuality and reality. This study systematically reviewed the literature on the application of AR in higher education between 2000 and 2023. A total of 237 articles were selected, and the key research findings were analyzed and synthesized based on the coding manual from five aspects: basic information, disciplines, technology features, instructional design, and research results. The results revealed interesting findings regarding AR literature in terms of publication trends and applied disciplines, technical features and affordances, instructional design, and learning outcomes and measurement methods. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted on 60 experimental studies selected from the literature to examine the overall effectiveness of AR-based instructions. The results indicate that AR applications in higher education tend to have a large overall effect size (g = 0.896, 95% confidence interval = [0.685–1.107], p = 0.000), with two significant moderators: instructional function and learning outcomes. Additional sensitivity and publication bias analyses confirmed the robustness of the meta-analytic findings. Based on these results, four implications for educational practice and research investigating AR-supported higher education were proposed and discussed. 
653 |a Augmented reality 
653 |a Pedagogy 
653 |a Higher education 
653 |a Trends 
653 |a Instructional design 
653 |a Research methodology 
653 |a Educational objectives 
653 |a Medical research 
653 |a Variables 
653 |a Independent study 
653 |a Systematic review 
653 |a Meta-analysis 
653 |a Control Groups 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Researchers 
653 |a Educational Technology 
653 |a Language Acquisition 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Meta Analysis 
653 |a Research Design 
653 |a Coding 
653 |a Career and Technical Education 
653 |a Effect Size 
653 |a Statistical Analysis 
653 |a Elementary Secondary Education 
653 |a Outcomes of Education 
653 |a Statistical Data 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Database Management Systems 
653 |a Educational Trends 
653 |a Synthesis 
700 1 |a Luo Heng 
700 1 |a Chen, Di 
700 1 |a Wang Peiyu 
700 1 |a Yin Xin 
700 1 |a Zhang Jiakai 
773 0 |t Education Sciences  |g vol. 15, no. 6 (2025), p. 678-702 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223901725/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223901725/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223901725/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch