Optimization of Process Parameters for Advanced High-Strength Steel JSC980Y Automotive Part Using Finite Element Simulation and Deep Neural Network
Guardado en:
| Udgivet i: | Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing vol. 9, no. 6 (2025), p. 197-219 |
|---|---|
| Hovedforfatter: | |
| Andre forfattere: | |
| Udgivet: |
MDPI AG
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Tags: |
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3223913865 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2504-4494 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jmmp9060197 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3223913865 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Sunanta Aekkapon | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Optimization of Process Parameters for Advanced High-Strength Steel JSC980Y Automotive Part Using Finite Element Simulation and Deep Neural Network | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In the stamping process of automotive parts, springback is a major problem when using Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS). This phenomenon significantly impacts the shape accuracy of products and is difficult to control. This study aims to optimize process parameters such as blank holder force (BHF), die clearance, and blank width to minimize springback in the workpiece. Using optimal process parameters will enhance the efficiency of die compensation processes. The study uses the Finite Element Method (FEM) simulation to predict forming behavior. The case study, Reinforcement-CTR PLR, is made from AHSS grade JSC980Y with a thickness of 1 mm. Four material model combinations were evaluated against actual experiment results to select the most accurate springback prediction model. A full factorial design was used for experiments with varied process parameters. The optimization process used regression and various Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). From the result, a Deep Neural Network (DNN) with two hidden layers performed with the highest accuracy compared to the other models. The optimal process parameters were identified as 27.62 tons BHF, 1 mm die clearance, and a 290 mm blank width. These optimal results achieved 98.05% of the part area within a displacement tolerance of −1 to 1 mm, closely matching FEM-based validation. | |
| 653 | |a Mechanical properties | ||
| 653 | |a Clearances | ||
| 653 | |a Finite element method | ||
| 653 | |a Accuracy | ||
| 653 | |a Design of experiments | ||
| 653 | |a Workpieces | ||
| 653 | |a Automotive parts | ||
| 653 | |a Metal forming | ||
| 653 | |a Optimization techniques | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial neural networks | ||
| 653 | |a High strength steel | ||
| 653 | |a Manufacturing | ||
| 653 | |a High strength steels | ||
| 653 | |a Steel | ||
| 653 | |a Computer simulation | ||
| 653 | |a Springback | ||
| 653 | |a Simulation | ||
| 653 | |a Parameter identification | ||
| 653 | |a Artificial intelligence | ||
| 653 | |a Prediction models | ||
| 653 | |a Neural networks | ||
| 653 | |a Optimization | ||
| 653 | |a Factorial design | ||
| 653 | |a Blankholders | ||
| 653 | |a Mathematical models | ||
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Popularity | ||
| 653 | |a Process parameters | ||
| 653 | |a Dies | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Suranuntchai Surasak | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing |g vol. 9, no. 6 (2025), p. 197-219 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223913865/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223913865/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3223913865/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |