Analysis of setup errors and determination of planning target volume margins for thorax (lung, oesophagus and breast) cancers: From Regional Radiotherapy Centre, Kashmir (North India)

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering vol. 31, no. 2 (2025), p. 146
1. Verfasser: Baba, Ainain
Weitere Verfasser: Sarkar, Biplab, Bari, Waseem
Veröffentlicht:
De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie das erste Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3224044477
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1425-4689 
022 |a 1898-0309 
024 7 |a 10.2478/pjmpe-2025-0016  |2 doi 
035 |a 3224044477 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 190934  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Baba, Ainain  |u Department of Physics, University of Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, India 
245 1 |a Analysis of setup errors and determination of planning target volume margins for thorax (lung, oesophagus and breast) cancers: From Regional Radiotherapy Centre, Kashmir (North India) 
260 |b De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a NOABSTRACTThe focus of this study was to determine the set-up errors so as to estimate the margin between the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and to suggest optimum margins for planning target volume (PTV) coverage in thorax cancers.In the present study data from 51 patients was incorporated. A total of 1308 portal images were examined. Set up errors were estimated by superimposing a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR), using an electronic portal image device (EPID) as a reference image. The Medio-Lateral (ML), Cranio-Caudal (CC), and Antero-Posterior (AP) directions were subsequently evaluated. According to the shifts obtained, systematic and random errors were computed. The van Herk formula was employed to determine the values for the clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins.The systematic error was found to be between 1.0 mm and 1.7 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.8 mm, and 2.1 mm and 3.1 mm along the x, y, and z axis. In the x, y, and z axis, the random error varied from 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm, 0.4 mm to 0.8 mm, and 0.7 mm to 1.7 mm, respectively. Based on the Van Herk equation, the PTV margin following our findings was estimated to be 4.7 mm, 3.3 mm, 8.8 mm for lung, 3.6 mm, 2.7 mm, and 5.7 mm for oesophagus, and 3.0 mm, 4.9 mm, and 8.6 mm for breast in the x, y, and z dimensions respectively.This study demonstrates that an 8.8 mm extension of CTV to PTV margin for the lung, 5.7 mm for the oesophagus, and 8.6 mm for the breast, serving as an upper limit, is sufficient to guarantee that 90% of patients diagnosed with thoracic cancers will receive a cumulative CTV dose that is at least 95% of the prescribed dose. 
653 |a Cancer 
653 |a Systematic errors 
653 |a Random errors 
653 |a Thorax 
653 |a Breast 
653 |a Lungs 
653 |a Radiation therapy 
653 |a Medical imaging 
700 1 |a Sarkar, Biplab  |u Chief Medical Physicist, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata, India 
700 1 |a Bari, Waseem  |u Department of Physics, University of Kashmir, Jammu & Kashmir, India 
773 0 |t Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering  |g vol. 31, no. 2 (2025), p. 146 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3224044477/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3224044477/fulltextPDF/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch