Ecological Niche Adaptations Influence Transposable Element Dynamics in Pollinating and Non‐Pollinating Fig Wasps

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ecology and Evolution vol. 15, no. 6 (Jun 1, 2025)
Autor principal: Liu, Jing
Otros Autores: Miao, Yun‐Heng, Hou, Hong‐Xia, Huang, Da‐Wei, Xiao, Jin‐Hua
Publicado:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Resumen:ABSTRACT This study explores how ecological niches influence the dynamics of transposable elements (TEs) in the genomes of pollinating and non‐pollinating fig wasps (NPFWs), and how these ecological factors shape genome evolution. To examine the protective role of fig fruits for pollinators, we compared TE load and dynamics in six pollinating and five NPFW species from six different Ficus species. Phylogenetic analysis was used to assess correlations between genome size, oviposition sites, and TE length. We also analyzed the effects of natural selection and population dynamics on TE accumulation. Significant differences were observed in the total length, number, and types of TEs between pollinators and NPFWs. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that TEs in NPFWs, driven by genome size and oviposition sites, exhibit an expanding state, while pollinators show “dormant” TE landscapes with limited insertions. Despite relaxed selection pressure aimed at prolonging TE retention, pollinators maintain a limited TE abundance, likely due to the contracted population size. Additionally, numerous cis‐regulatory modules derived from TEs are located near genes involved in environmental information processing, emphasizing their potential role in adaptation. Our findings highlight the role of ecological niches, represented by oviposition sites, in shaping the TE dynamics of fig wasps. These results provide new insights into how ecological pressures influence genome evolution and adaptation in insects.
ISSN:2045-7758
DOI:10.1002/ece3.71553
Fuente:Agriculture Science Database