Computationally derived linguistic features of L2 narrative essays and their relations to human-judged writing quality

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language Testing in Asia vol. 15, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 35
Autor principal: Janebi Enayat, Mostafa
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3226092122
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2229-0443 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s40468-025-00374-9  |2 doi 
035 |a 3226092122 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
084 |a 243835  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Janebi Enayat, Mostafa  |u University of Maragheh, Marāgheh, Iran, Islamic Republic of (GRID:grid.449862.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0518 4224) 
245 1 |a Computationally derived linguistic features of L2 narrative essays and their relations to human-judged writing quality 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Computational tools have become increasingly prevalent in the analysis and evaluation of various linguistic dimensions in second language (L2) writing pedagogy and research. Despite their widespread use, there is limited research investigating the alignment between computationally derived linguistic features and human assessments of academic writing quality. To fill this gap, this study probed the extent to which computational indices of syntactic and lexical features predict human-judged assessments of narrative writing quality. A total of 104 essays written by Iranian undergraduate learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) were analyzed using three computational tools: Coh-Metrix, VocabProfiler, and the Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion (TAACO). The results from correlation and regression analyses revealed that the computational indices of lexical features were significant predictors of human-judged writing quality, with lexical diversity and sophistication emerging as the most significant predictors. Manual coding of syntactic complexity proved to be a stronger predictor of writing quality than computational measures of this text feature. These findings underscore the value of computational tools in L2 writing assessment, while simultaneously highlighting their limitations in capturing the multifaceted nature of writing quality. Furthermore, the results point to an overemphasis on infrequent and diverse vocabulary in current analytic writing rubrics, suggesting that these rubrics should be revised to adopt a more comprehensive perspective on lexical proficiency in L2 writing pedagogy and evaluation. 
653 |a Pedagogy 
653 |a Language acquisition 
653 |a Writing 
653 |a Second language writing instruction 
653 |a Narratives 
653 |a Academic writing 
653 |a English as a second language learning 
653 |a English as a second language 
653 |a Language assessment 
653 |a Writing instruction 
653 |a Second language writing 
653 |a Second language learning 
653 |a Linguistics 
653 |a Syntactic complexity 
653 |a Automatic text analysis 
653 |a Sophistication 
653 |a Humans 
653 |a Teaching 
653 |a Foreign languages 
653 |a Indexes 
653 |a Evaluation 
653 |a English language 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Vocabulary 
653 |a Scholarship 
653 |a Foreign language learning 
653 |a Nouns 
653 |a Literature Reviews 
653 |a Coordination 
653 |a Language Research 
653 |a Direct Instruction 
653 |a Academic Achievement 
653 |a English (Second Language) 
653 |a Syntax 
653 |a Essays 
653 |a Writing Skills 
653 |a English Learners 
653 |a Technical Writing 
653 |a Cognitive Development 
653 |a Educational Strategies 
653 |a Grammar 
653 |a Sentence Structure 
773 0 |t Language Testing in Asia  |g vol. 15, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 35 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Education Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226092122/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226092122/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226092122/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch