In Defence of Forgery
保存先:
| 出版年: | PQDT - Global (2025) |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| 出版事項: |
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | Citation/Abstract Full text outside of ProQuest |
| タグ: |
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3226382302 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 035 | |a 3226382302 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 189128 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Levine, Lauren | |
| 245 | 1 | |a In Defence of Forgery | |
| 260 | |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Dissertation/Thesis | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a In this thesis, I provide a defence of forgery against criticisms made by Sherri Irvin in her ‘Forgery and the Corruption of Aesthetic Understanding’. First, I show that forgeries do not necessarily corrupt our aesthetic understanding. Next, I show how forgeries can be beneficial to our aesthetic understanding. They can act as a corrective to other problems in our aesthetic understanding; stimulate interest in art and aesthetics; act as a form of criticism; be interesting artworks in their own right and lead to greater cognitive diversity in our aesthetic judgements. Finally, I set out the benefits to our aesthetic understanding that forgeries can provide, by showing where we should place our aesthetic credibility or trust. | |
| 653 | |a Art criticism | ||
| 653 | |a Aesthetics | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t PQDT - Global |g (2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3226382302/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full text outside of ProQuest |u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-562310 |