Misinformation reminders enhance belief updating and memory for corrections: the role of attention during encoding revealed by eye tracking

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cognitive Research vol. 10, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 39
Autor principal: Wellons, Bayley M.
Otros Autores: Wahlheim, Christopher N.
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227475509
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2365-7464 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s41235-025-00649-y  |2 doi 
035 |a 3227475509 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Wellons, Bayley M.  |u University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Psychology, Greensboro, USA (GRID:grid.266860.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0671 255X) 
245 1 |a Misinformation reminders enhance belief updating and memory for corrections: the role of attention during encoding revealed by eye tracking 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Misinformation exposure can cause inaccurate beliefs and memories. These unwanted outcomes can be mitigated when misinformation reminders—veracity-labeled statements that repeat earlier-read false information—appear before corrections with true information. The present experiment used eye tracking to examine the role of attention while encoding corrective details in the beneficial effects of reminder-based corrections. Participants read headlines in a belief-updating task that included a within-subjects manipulation of correction format. They first rated the familiarity and veracity of true and false headlines (Phase 1). Then, they read true headlines that corrected false headlines or affirmed true headlines (Phase 2). The true headlines appeared (1) without veracity labels, (2) with veracity labels, or (3) with misinformation reminders and veracity labels. Finally, participants re-rated the veracity of the Phase 1 headlines and rated their memory for whether those headlines were corrected in Phase 2 (Phase 3). Reminder-based corrections led to the greatest reduction in false beliefs, best high confidence recognition of corrections, and earliest eye fixations to the true details of corrections during encoding in Phase 2. Corrections remembered with the highest confidence rating were associated with more and earlier fixations to true details in correction statements in Phase 2. Collectively, these results suggest that misinformation reminders directed attention to corrective details, which improved encoding and subsequent memory for veracity information. These results have applied implications in suggesting that optimal correction formats should include features that direct attention to, and thus support encoding of, the contrast between false and true information. 
653 |a Reminder effects 
653 |a Eye movements 
653 |a Accuracy 
653 |a Perceptions 
653 |a Familiarity 
653 |a Social networks 
653 |a False information 
653 |a Memory 
653 |a Journalism 
653 |a Recall (Psychology) 
653 |a Beliefs 
653 |a Experiments 
653 |a Social Media 
653 |a Inferences 
653 |a Process Approach (Writing) 
653 |a Repetition 
653 |a Attention 
700 1 |a Wahlheim, Christopher N.  |u University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Psychology, Greensboro, USA (GRID:grid.266860.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0671 255X) 
773 0 |t Cognitive Research  |g vol. 10, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 39 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Psychology Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227475509/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227475509/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227475509/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch