The value of publishing case reports for the professional development of Chinese residents: a qualitative study

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
I whakaputaina i:BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-14
Kaituhi matua: Yang, Zhihui
Ētahi atu kaituhi: Chen, Wen, Li, Ruoyu, Wang, Xiaowen, Yao, Mi
I whakaputaina:
Springer Nature B.V.
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Ngā Tūtohu: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227642682
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07459-2  |2 doi 
035 |a 3227642682 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Yang, Zhihui 
245 1 |a The value of publishing case reports for the professional development of Chinese residents: a qualitative study 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a BackgroundIn comparison with high-income countries, medical education resources in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as China, are severely lacking. In China, residents' clinical work is characterized by extensive demands and mechanized approaches, resulting in a paucity of opportunities for active thinking and learning during clinical rotations. Moreover, these residents lack the time and experience necessary for scientific research training. However, these countries possess a wealth of case resources, including numerous classical and complex cases that hold significant teaching and publication value. The effective utilization of this advantage and the integration of case reporting as a distinctive graduate medical education (GME) platform remain to be explored.MethodsThe study was conducted between September 2023 and March 2024 in Beijing, China. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 15 residents who were in the first or second stage of standardized residency training and had successful experience in publishing case reports. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted on a one-on-one basis to explore the role of case reports in the professional development of residents in LMICs. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the data.ResultsOf the 15 participants, 3 were male and 12 were female, with an average age of 27.2±2.6 years. 12 subthemes were extracted, from which 5 themes were identified, including clinical professional competency, scientific research competency, collaborative and communicative competency, sources of pressure and implementation evaluation. In terms of clinical competency, publishing case reports can increase residents' basic medical knowledge reserve, practical ability of diagnosis and treatment, and self-learning in daily clinical practice. In terms of scientific research competency, the case report can guide young residents to commence their academic careers, improve academic writing skills and strengthen their initiative in scientific research. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that case reports can enhance awareness and skills in multidisciplinary collaborations, as well as communication with patients, supervisors and journal editors/reviewers. Heavy clinical responsibilities during residency training are common external pressures while anxiety is a common internal pressure during case report writing. Feasible aspects of integrating case report training into GME in LMICs include the relatively low time commitment and abundant case resources. However, challenges include inconsistent training and assessment standards.ConclusionsIt is suggested that case report training be specially integrated into GME in LMICs with sufficient valuable case resources and capacity to manage complex cases, based on the value of case report experience in the career development of residents and the current situation of medical education in these countries. 
610 4 |a Peking University 
651 4 |a Beijing China 
651 4 |a China 
651 4 |a Japan 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Medical education 
653 |a Collaboration 
653 |a Writing 
653 |a Clinical medicine 
653 |a Adult learning 
653 |a Professional development 
653 |a Data analysis 
653 |a Interviews 
653 |a Research methodology 
653 |a Medical history 
653 |a Experiential learning 
653 |a Publishing 
653 |a Hospitals 
653 |a Case reports 
653 |a Qualitative research 
653 |a Independent study 
653 |a Desktop Publishing 
653 |a Educational Benefits 
653 |a Critical Thinking 
653 |a Research Training 
653 |a Learning Motivation 
653 |a Active Learning 
653 |a Educational Methods 
653 |a Graduate Medical Education 
653 |a Researchers 
653 |a Learning Theories 
653 |a Developed Nations 
653 |a Concept Teaching 
653 |a Competency Based Education 
653 |a Student Motivation 
653 |a Andragogy 
653 |a Computer Software 
700 1 |a Chen, Wen 
700 1 |a Li, Ruoyu 
700 1 |a Wang, Xiaowen 
700 1 |a Yao, Mi 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-14 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227642682/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227642682/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227642682/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch