Developing Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for Interim Assessments That Include All Students. NCEO Report 445

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:National Center on Educational Outcomes (2025)
Autor principal: Wesley, Bruce
Autor corporatiu: National Center on Educational Outcomes Council of Chief State School Officers National Association of State Directors of Special Education WestEd University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration
Publicat:
National Center on Educational Outcomes
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227886589
003 UK-CbPIL
035 |a 3227886589 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a ED673288 
100 1 |a Wesley, Bruce 
110 2 |a National Center on Educational Outcomes Council of Chief State School Officers National Association of State Directors of Special Education WestEd University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration 
245 1 |a Developing Requests for Proposals (RFPs) for Interim Assessments That Include All Students. NCEO Report 445 
260 |b National Center on Educational Outcomes  |c 2025 
513 |a Report 
520 3 |a This report provides a resource for state and district assessment staff as they develop requests for proposals (RFPs) for interim assessments for all of their students, including those who require accessibility features, to demonstrate their knowledge and skills as well as those who may need an alternate assessment because of their significant cognitive disability. This report provides ideas for ensuring that bids for interim assessments address the needs of all students, including students with disabilities and English learners. States' procurement practices, assessment policies, and internal capacities vary widely, so this report deliberately presents a range of example language that might be used in a request for proposal (RFP). The example language was derived from actual state RFPs. States should factor in the costs (both time and financial) associated with the different approaches and select a path that best meets their assessment needs and the resources available in the state. 
653 |a Program Proposals 
653 |a Grants 
653 |a Research Proposals 
653 |a Proposal Writing 
653 |a Educational Assessment 
653 |a Alternative Assessment 
653 |a Student Needs 
653 |a Needs Assessment 
653 |a Students with Disabilities 
653 |a English Learners 
653 |a Educational Legislation 
653 |a Equal Education 
653 |a Federal Legislation 
653 |a Inclusion 
653 |a Educational Discrimination 
653 |a Assistive Technology 
653 |a Bias 
653 |a Standard Setting 
653 |a Testing 
653 |a Test Bias 
773 0 |t National Center on Educational Outcomes  |g (2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ERIC 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227886589/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED673288