Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Student Cross-Specialty Procedural Training: Effective Collaboration and Student Experience

Guardado en:
Bibliografiske detaljer
Udgivet i:Journal of Nursing Education vol. 64, no. 7 (Jul 2025), p. e64
Hovedforfatter: Adamski, Jennifer
Andre forfattere: Wiltse Nicely, Kelly L
Udgivet:
SLACK INCORPORATED
Fag:
Online adgang:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3227919043
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0148-4834 
022 |a 1938-2421 
022 |a 0022-3158 
024 7 |a 10.3928/01484834-20240612-03  |2 doi 
035 |a 3227919043 
045 2 |b d20250701  |b d20250731 
084 |a 23497  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Adamski, Jennifer 
245 1 |a Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Student Cross-Specialty Procedural Training: Effective Collaboration and Student Experience 
260 |b SLACK INCORPORATED  |c Jul 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Background Intraprofessional simulation and training in acute care nursing specialties can generate synergies that will promote safe, quality patient care. Method Implementation of multiple intraprofessional simulations across the life span allowed for sharing of faculty and simulation resources. Simulations encompassed both adult and pediatric patients and consisted of airway skills, point-of-care ultrasound, and a multi-skills day encompassing vascular access experiences, chest tube placement, and lumbar puncture. Results During 5 years, 235 graduate students across three advanced practice nursing specialties participated in the intraprofessional simulation. Learner feedback showed improved confidence, benefit to future practice, and improved clinical judgment via these intraprofessional simulations. Conclusion Future development of standardized and validated assessments to evaluate each skill will provide quantitative metrics for each clinical skill set and patient population. Further, additional initiatives will include both continuing and expanding intraprofessional simulation offerings, as well as developing interprofessional simulations with physician assistant and perfusionist colleagues. [J Nurs Educ. 2025;64(7):e64–e67.] 
653 |a Intubation 
653 |a Emergency medical care 
653 |a Students 
653 |a Ventilators 
653 |a Nursing education 
653 |a Collaboration 
653 |a Catheters 
653 |a Accreditation 
653 |a Point of care testing 
653 |a Pediatrics 
653 |a Advanced practice nurses 
653 |a Skills 
653 |a Patients 
653 |a Simulation 
653 |a Educational objectives 
653 |a Knowledge 
653 |a College campuses 
653 |a Nursing care 
653 |a Pandemics 
653 |a Response rates 
653 |a Ostomy 
653 |a Didacticism 
653 |a Ultrasonic imaging 
653 |a Learning 
653 |a Critical care 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Nurses 
653 |a Graduate Students 
653 |a Minimum Competencies 
653 |a Student Experience 
653 |a Ventilation 
653 |a Young Children 
653 |a Simulated Environment 
653 |a Student Evaluation 
653 |a Skill Development 
653 |a Psychomotor Skills 
653 |a Student Participation 
653 |a Allied Health Occupations Education 
653 |a Aging (Individuals) 
653 |a Professional Education 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Educational Needs 
700 1 |a Wiltse Nicely, Kelly L 
773 0 |t Journal of Nursing Education  |g vol. 64, no. 7 (Jul 2025), p. e64 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227919043/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227919043/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3227919043/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch