Physical Education Teachers' Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Опубліковано в::Physical Educator vol. 82, no. 3 (2025), p. 347-363
Автор: Adams, Alex
Інші автори: Belcher, Don
Опубліковано:
Sagamore Publishing LLC
Предмети:
Онлайн доступ:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3229509538
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 0031-8981 
022 |a 2160-1682 
024 7 |a 10.18666/TPE-2025-V-82-13-11236  |2 doi 
035 |a 3229509538 
045 2 |b d20250501  |b d20250630 
084 |a 33472  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Adams, Alex  |u Health and Human Performance, Austin Peay State University 
245 1 |a Physical Education Teachers' Technology Self-Efficacy and Integration 
260 |b Sagamore Publishing LLC  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Technology in education strives to parallel the high-tech world we live in. When students' learning environment reflects the ways in which they engage the world, they will excel in their education (Christen, 2009). Physical education teachers (PETs) have reported many barriers to using and integrating educational technology (e.g., НИ & Valdez-Garcia, 2020). PETS' perceived self-efficacy (SE) may play an important role in their ability to integrate technology. The purpose of this study was to explore in-service PETS' self-efficacy to integrate technology into their teaching. Method: Eighty-three in-service PETs (Male=31.3%, Female=68.7%), from around the United States, completed an online version of the previously validated Computer Technology Integration Survey for Physical Education (Krause, 2017). Analysis focused on relationships of participant's SE and technology use. Results indicate a relationship with the level of mastery experiences (r=.48, p<.001), technology training (r=.45, p<.001), social persuasion experiences (r=.28, p<.001), and (vicarious experiences (r=.28, p<.01), to participants' technology SE (M=3.70, SD= .94; 1-5 scale). Participants' specific technology training and use are presented, with corresponding correlations to indicate how well SE relates to use. Participants' SE was lower than physical education student teachers (Krause, 2017) but similar to PET education faculty (O'Neil & Krause, 2019). PETs may be well equipped to use educational technology after student teaching but may need more training to keep up with the everchanging world of technology. Professional development opportunities for PETs should focus on providing mastery experiences over vicarious and social persuasion experiences. Furthermore, some educational tools (i.e., Plickers) are valued and used more when PETs have an adequate level of specific educational technology training. Future research should focus on measuring the effects of a professional development workshop on PETSs' SE. 
651 4 |a United States--US 
653 |a Standards 
653 |a Internet 
653 |a Physical education teachers 
653 |a Student teaching 
653 |a School environment 
653 |a Professional development 
653 |a Social networks 
653 |a Educational technology 
653 |a Likert scale 
653 |a Feedback 
653 |a Technology education 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Classrooms 
653 |a Word processing 
653 |a Self-efficacy 
653 |a School districts 
653 |a Educational Opportunities 
653 |a Technology Planning 
653 |a Self Efficacy 
653 |a Influence of Technology 
653 |a Likert Scales 
653 |a Teacher Surveys 
653 |a Technology Integration 
653 |a Laptop Computers 
653 |a Middle Schools 
653 |a Computer Oriented Programs 
653 |a Classroom Techniques 
653 |a Feedback (Response) 
653 |a Beliefs 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a National Standards 
700 1 |a Belcher, Don  |u Health and Human Performance, Middle Tennessee State University 
773 0 |t Physical Educator  |g vol. 82, no. 3 (2025), p. 347-363 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Consumer Health Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229509538/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229509538/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3229509538/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch