A Comparative Evaluation of Threshold Segmentation and LiDAR for Sawmill Residue Volume Estimation

Shranjeno v:
Bibliografske podrobnosti
izdano v:Forests vol. 16, no. 7 (2025), p. 1045-1062
Glavni avtor: Borrego-Núñez, Carlos
Drugi avtorji: García-Quezada Juan de Dios, Vásquez-Ibarra, Leonardo, López-Serrano, Pablito Marcelo, Domínguez-Calleros, Pedro Antonio, Carrillo-Parra, Artemio, Compeán-Aguirre, Jorge Luis
Izdano:
MDPI AG
Teme:
Online dostop:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Oznake: Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3233203288
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1999-4907 
024 7 |a 10.3390/f16071045  |2 doi 
035 |a 3233203288 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231463  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Borrego-Núñez, Carlos  |u Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; carlosborrego29@gmail.com 
245 1 |a A Comparative Evaluation of Threshold Segmentation and LiDAR for Sawmill Residue Volume Estimation 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The sawn timber production process generates up to 63% of residues during primary processing in sawmills. For this industry, the devaluation and disposal of these residues remain significant challenges; proper management requires a more accurate quantification of the volume. This study evaluates and compares two indirect methods for estimating the volume of stacked residues: one based on image processing and the other on terrestrial LiDAR technology. Residues of Pinus spp. from a sawmill were used, with their actual volume determined using a xylometer. The image-based method, which uses threshold-based segmentation, achieved a R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 0.006 m3. In contrast, the LiDAR-based method, which derives measurements directly from 3D reconstruction, obtained an R2 = 0.506 and RMSE = 0.009 m3. Despite these differences, ANOVA testing (p > 0.05) indicated no statistically significant differences between the methods. The results suggest that both approaches may serve as preliminary tools for forest residue quantification and provide a solid foundation for future research aimed at developing field-applicable technological solutions. 
651 4 |a Canada 
651 4 |a Mexico 
653 |a Sawmills 
653 |a Land area 
653 |a Wood 
653 |a Accuracy 
653 |a Lidar 
653 |a Segmentation 
653 |a Timber 
653 |a Image processing 
653 |a Statistical analysis 
653 |a Variance analysis 
653 |a Forest management 
653 |a Image reconstruction 
653 |a Image segmentation 
653 |a Computer vision 
653 |a Forest residues 
653 |a Residues 
653 |a Methods 
653 |a Estimation 
653 |a Economic 
653 |a Environmental 
700 1 |a García-Quezada Juan de Dios  |u Laboratorio de Investigación en Biomasa y Energía Renovable (LIBER), Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; juan_garcia_1992@outlook.com 
700 1 |a Vásquez-Ibarra, Leonardo  |u Department of Computing and Industries, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Av. San Miguel 3605, Talca 3480112, Chile; lvasquezi@ucm.cl 
700 1 |a López-Serrano, Pablito Marcelo  |u Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; p_lopez@ujed.mx (P.M.L.-S.); acarrilloparra@ujed.mx (A.C.-P.) 
700 1 |a Domínguez-Calleros, Pedro Antonio  |u Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Ambientales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; pedroantonio.dominguez@ujed.mx 
700 1 |a Carrillo-Parra, Artemio  |u Instituto de Silvicultura e Industria de la Madera, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; p_lopez@ujed.mx (P.M.L.-S.); acarrilloparra@ujed.mx (A.C.-P.) 
700 1 |a Compeán-Aguirre, Jorge Luis  |u Programa Institucional de Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango 34120, Mexico; carlosborrego29@gmail.com 
773 0 |t Forests  |g vol. 16, no. 7 (2025), p. 1045-1062 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Agriculture Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3233203288/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3233203288/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3233203288/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch