Digital Transformation in Aircraft Design and Certification: Developing Requirements for Modeling Regulatory Documentation

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Aerospace vol. 12, no. 8 (2025), p. 724-748
المؤلف الرئيسي: Cartile Andréa
مؤلفون آخرون: Marsden Catharine, Liscouët-Hanke, Susan
منشور في:
MDPI AG
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3243962745
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2226-4310 
024 7 |a 10.3390/aerospace12080724  |2 doi 
035 |a 3243962745 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 231330  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Cartile Andréa  |u Mechanical, Industrial, and Aerospace Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada; susan.liscouet-hanke@concordia.ca 
245 1 |a Digital Transformation in Aircraft Design and Certification: Developing Requirements for Modeling Regulatory Documentation 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Aircraft design and development is complex and regulated by increasingly stringent regulatory documentation. While many disciplines manage design complexity with well-established digital tools, digital transformation of the certification process remains in the early stages of implementation. Models are often used to provide explicit structures to facilitate digital transformation. While several modeling approaches have been applied to regulatory documentation, a gap remains for an established list of requirements for developing effective models in the context of digital transformation. This paper proposes a list of requirements using a requirements elicitation framework adapted from the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Needs and Requirements Manual. The adapted research methodology includes problem identification, needs assessment, and requirements development processes. The resulting requirements are validated against needs statements and verified against selected INCOSE requirement statement criteria. Four requirements are selected for a detailed feasibility assessment, which compares the efficacy of process mapping, Unified Modeling Language (UML), and ontological modeling methods to realize the requirements. 
610 4 |a Federal Aviation Administration--FAA 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Software 
653 |a Requirements specifications 
653 |a Documentation 
653 |a Ontology 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a Modelling 
653 |a Civil aviation 
653 |a Aerospace engineering 
653 |a Systems engineering 
653 |a Cognition & reasoning 
653 |a Requirements analysis 
653 |a Natural language 
653 |a Certification 
653 |a Aircraft design 
653 |a Aircraft 
653 |a Needs analysis 
653 |a Digital transformation 
653 |a Computer aided design--CAD 
653 |a Knowledge management 
653 |a Effectiveness 
653 |a Process mapping 
653 |a Compliance 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Complexity 
700 1 |a Marsden Catharine  |u Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON K7K 7B4, Canada 
700 1 |a Liscouët-Hanke, Susan  |u Mechanical, Industrial, and Aerospace Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada; susan.liscouet-hanke@concordia.ca 
773 0 |t Aerospace  |g vol. 12, no. 8 (2025), p. 724-748 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3243962745/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3243962745/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3243962745/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch