Adversarial Training for Aerial Disaster Recognition: A Curriculum-Based Defense Against PGD Attacks
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Electronics vol. 14, no. 16 (2025), p. 3210-3225 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3244012717 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2079-9292 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/electronics14163210 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3244012717 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231458 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kose Kubra | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Adversarial Training for Aerial Disaster Recognition: A Curriculum-Based Defense Against PGD Attacks | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) play an ever-increasing role in disaster response and remote sensing. However, the deep learning models they rely on remain highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. This paper presents an evaluation and defense framework aimed at enhancing adversarial robustness in aerial disaster image classification using the AIDERV2 dataset. Our methodology is structured into the following four phases: (I) baseline training with clean data using ResNet-50, (II) vulnerability assessment under Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks, (III) adversarial training with PGD to improve model resilience, and (IV) comprehensive post-defense evaluation under identical attack scenarios. The baseline model achieves 93.25% accuracy on clean data but drops to as low as 21.00% under strong adversarial perturbations. In contrast, the adversarially trained model maintains over 75.00% accuracy across all PGD configurations, reducing the attack success rate by more than 60%. We introduce metrics, such as Clean Accuracy, Adversarial Accuracy, Accuracy Drop, and Attack Success Rate, to evaluate defense performance. Our results show the practical importance of adversarial training for safety-critical UAV applications and provide a reference point for future research. This work contributes to making deep learning systems on aerial platforms more secure, robust, and reliable in mission-critical environments. | |
| 653 | |a Accuracy | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 653 | |a Deep learning | ||
| 653 | |a Datasets | ||
| 653 | |a Performance evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Unmanned aerial vehicles | ||
| 653 | |a Experiments | ||
| 653 | |a Classification | ||
| 653 | |a Remote sensing | ||
| 653 | |a Image classification | ||
| 653 | |a Diffusion models | ||
| 653 | |a Remote sensing systems | ||
| 653 | |a Earthquakes | ||
| 653 | |a Defense | ||
| 653 | |a Disasters | ||
| 653 | |a Monitoring systems | ||
| 653 | |a Safety critical | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Bing | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Electronics |g vol. 14, no. 16 (2025), p. 3210-3225 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244012717/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244012717/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3244012717/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |