Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher education- a cultural historical activity theory perspective
Spremljeno u:
| Izdano u: | Education Inquiry vol. 16, no. 3 (Sep 2025), p. 303-326 |
|---|---|
| Glavni autor: | |
| Izdano: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | Citation/Abstract Full Text - PDF |
| Oznake: |
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3245524727 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2000-4508 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/20004508.2023.2222450 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3245524727 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250901 |b d20250930 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Rahnuma, Naureen |u Department of English and Modern Languages Independent University , Dhaka , Bangladesh | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher education- a cultural historical activity theory perspective | |
| 260 | |b Taylor & Francis Ltd. |c Sep 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a ABSTRACT Writing in discipline and across the curriculum as an academic literacy practice has been the subject of a growing body of research in HE over the past few decades. In Bangladesh, however, effective academic writing in English as a second language (ESL) is an interminable challenge for tertiary students. This study uses a sociocultural theoretical lens by applying a CHAT framework to develop an in-depth, contextualised understanding of how Bangladeshi HE students engage with writing in an ESL setting while collaborating among individual learners and their social learning contexts. Drawing on data collected from in-depth interviews, the paper elucidates how learners construct subjective accounts of their perception of academic writing in HE and identifies six contradictions in their writing trajectory. In conclusion, the implications of utilising a CHAT framework as a reflective tool to re-evaluate, re-envision and remodel learning activity systems while steering interventions at micro, meso and macro-level policymaking to enhance expansive learning are discussed. | |
| 653 | |a Literacy | ||
| 653 | |a Writing | ||
| 653 | |a Chat | ||
| 653 | |a Higher education | ||
| 653 | |a Educational activities | ||
| 653 | |a Academic writing | ||
| 653 | |a Students | ||
| 653 | |a English as a second language | ||
| 653 | |a Learning environment | ||
| 653 | |a Second language writing | ||
| 653 | |a English as a second language instruction | ||
| 653 | |a Academic disciplines | ||
| 653 | |a Subjectivity | ||
| 653 | |a Sociocultural factors | ||
| 653 | |a Policy making | ||
| 653 | |a Social learning | ||
| 653 | |a English language | ||
| 653 | |a Activity theory | ||
| 653 | |a College students | ||
| 653 | |a Curricula | ||
| 653 | |a Learning Activities | ||
| 653 | |a English (Second Language) | ||
| 653 | |a English | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Education Inquiry |g vol. 16, no. 3 (Sep 2025), p. 303-326 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Research Library | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3245524727/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3245524727/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |