Developing consensus on the competency and assessment of pharmacist preceptors

保存先:
書誌詳細
出版年:BMC Medical Education vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-9
第一著者: Bartlett, Andrew D
その他の著者: Um, Irene S, Krass, Ines, Schneider, Carl R
出版事項:
Springer Nature B.V.
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3247111178
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1472-6920 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s12909-025-07738-y  |2 doi 
035 |a 3247111178 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 58506  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Bartlett, Andrew D 
245 1 |a Developing consensus on the competency and assessment of pharmacist preceptors 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a BackgroundPharmacist preceptors facilitate the professional development of students and interns during preregistration training. Evaluating preceptor competency is essential for ensuring the quality and consistency of the training process. For effective evaluation to occur, consensus is needed to establish which preceptor competencies require assessment as well as the method of assessment and who should perform the assessment.MethodsThe Delphi method was used to develop a consensus among experts in pharmacy education, accreditation, and practice settings. The study involved three rounds of anonymous surveys in REDCap, focusing on the necessity, feasibility, and methods of assessing preceptor competencies. A previous literature review identified 16 evidence-based competencies that formed the basis of the survey. An agreement level of 70% was set as the threshold for consensus.ResultsAmong the 59 invited experts, 22 completed the first round, 13 completed the second round, and eight completed the last round. Consensus was achieved on 17 competencies, with 16 deemed feasible to assess. Eight were considered mandatory for assessment, and four were preferable. Consensus on assessment methods and suitable assessors was achieved for these patients. Four competencies were feasible to assess but lacked consensus on the method or assessor. A multimodal assessment approach, including preceptee surveys, self-assessments, and peer observations, was identified as suitable.ConclusionsUsing a Delphi consensus method, by expert opinion, our study supports the perceived feasibility of assessing pharmacy preceptor competencies via a multimodal approach and clarifies who should assess each competency and how. Implementing these assessments can enhance preceptorship quality, facilitating consistent experiential placements for preceptees. The incorporation of preceptor assessment into accreditation standards should be considered essential to promote high-quality preceptorship and support the ongoing professional development of preceptors. 
610 4 |a University of Sydney 
651 4 |a Australia 
653 |a Internships 
653 |a Self evaluation 
653 |a Work environment 
653 |a Training 
653 |a Accreditation 
653 |a Professional development 
653 |a Quality control 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Drug stores 
653 |a Professions 
653 |a Pharmacy 
653 |a Supervision 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Nursing 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Professional Training 
653 |a Accreditation (Institutions) 
653 |a Minimum Competency Testing 
653 |a Opinions 
653 |a Competence 
653 |a Pharmaceutical Education 
653 |a Experiential Learning 
653 |a Internship Programs 
653 |a Psychotherapy 
653 |a Health Occupations 
653 |a Quality Assurance 
653 |a Modeling (Psychology) 
653 |a Feedback (Response) 
653 |a Conflict Resolution 
653 |a Delphi Technique 
653 |a Role Models 
653 |a Evidence Based Practice 
653 |a Educational Assessment 
653 |a Educational Environment 
653 |a Academic Standards 
653 |a Educational Needs 
700 1 |a Um, Irene S 
700 1 |a Krass, Ines 
700 1 |a Schneider, Carl R 
773 0 |t BMC Medical Education  |g vol. 25 (2025), p. 1-9 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Healthcare Administration Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111178/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111178/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3247111178/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch