Optimization of Energy Consumption and Light Environment for Three-Domain Division Cadmium Telluride Photovoltaic Windows Based on Entropy Weight–TOPSIS

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:Buildings vol. 15, no. 18 (2025), p. 3296-3317
מחבר ראשי: Hong-Xia, Yang
מחברים אחרים: Chun-Yan, He, Xue-Rui, Wang, Zheng, Hai
יצא לאור:
MDPI AG
נושאים:
גישה מקוונת:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3254477197
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2075-5309 
024 7 |a 10.3390/buildings15183296  |2 doi 
035 |a 3254477197 
045 2 |b d20250915  |b d20250930 
084 |a 231437  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Hong-Xia, Yang 
245 1 |a Optimization of Energy Consumption and Light Environment for Three-Domain Division Cadmium Telluride Photovoltaic Windows Based on Entropy Weight–TOPSIS 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a To address the limitations of traditional cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaic (PV) windows in comprehensively considering overall building energy consumption, indoor lighting comfort, and outdoor visibility, this study proposes a three-domain division CdTe PV window design, which divides the window into three areas, each undertaking different functions. This study utilized the Energy Plus 9.3.0 software and Radiance 1.6.0 software for numerical simulation to explore the impact of different design parameters (such as coverage rate and arrangement mode of PV) of the three-domain division PV windows on building energy consumption and the proportion of indoor effective natural lighting (UDI300lx–2000lx) in single-story office buildings in Yan’an. Additionally, this study employed the entropy weight–TOPSIS method to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 84 schemes. The results indicate that both the coverage rate and the arrangement mode of PV significantly influence building energy-saving and indoor lighting environment. The energy-saving rate initially increases and then decreases with higher PV coverage, while UDI300lx–2000lx generally exhibits an upward trend and slightly decreases later. The V3-V1 or H3-V1 arrangement mode demonstrates superior energy-saving performance, whereas the H3-V1 or V3-H1 arrangement mode provides better indoor lighting comfort. The evaluation weights for energy-saving rate and effective daylighting are 0.38 and 0.62, respectively. Based on the comprehensive evaluation, the optimal configuration is determined to be V1-90%-V2-10%-H3-90%, achieving an energy-saving rate of 11.1% and a UDI300lx–2000lx value of 56.95%. 
651 4 |a China 
653 |a Cold 
653 |a Cadmium telluride 
653 |a Green buildings 
653 |a Natural lighting 
653 |a Windows (computer programs) 
653 |a Optimization 
653 |a Cadmium 
653 |a Entropy 
653 |a Lighting 
653 |a Heat 
653 |a Energy conservation 
653 |a Office buildings 
653 |a Daylighting 
653 |a Energy consumption 
653 |a Ventilation 
653 |a Photovoltaic cells 
653 |a Indoor environments 
653 |a Cadmium tellurides 
653 |a Photovoltaics 
653 |a Electricity 
653 |a Outdoors 
653 |a Light 
653 |a Design parameters 
653 |a Mathematical models 
653 |a Climate 
653 |a Software 
700 1 |a Chun-Yan, He 
700 1 |a Xue-Rui, Wang 
700 1 |a Zheng, Hai 
773 0 |t Buildings  |g vol. 15, no. 18 (2025), p. 3296-3317 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Engineering Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254477197/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254477197/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3254477197/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch