What else comes with a geographical concept beyond geography? The renaissance of the term ‘Carpathian Basin’ in the Hungarian Parliament

Gardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Intersections vol. 11, no. 1 (2025), p. 3-40
Autor Principal: Németh, Renáta
Outros autores: Katona, Eszter, Balogh, Péter, Rakovics, Zsófia, Unger, Anna
Publicado:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Social Sciences
Materias:
Acceso en liña:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3255466665
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2416-089X 
024 7 |a 10.17356/ieejsp.v11i1.1241  |2 doi 
035 |a 3255466665 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20250331 
100 1 |a Németh, Renáta 
245 1 |a What else comes with a geographical concept beyond geography? The renaissance of the term ‘Carpathian Basin’ in the Hungarian Parliament 
260 |b Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Centre for Social Sciences  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a A key tenet from research on geographical concepts is that these are never neutral but filled with different ideas and agendas. The ‘Carpathian Basin’ is one of the most significant concepts in Hungarian geographical thought, but its recently reemerging use in political discourse has not yet been studied through quantitative text analysis.In this paper, we describe how a structural topic model was used to analyze the 1,525 speeches containing the term delivered in the Hungarian Parliament between 1998 and 2020.Our results indicate a renaissance in the use of the term, both in terms of its more frequent use and its discursive meaning as a sign of a turn in national policy. At the same time, ‘Carpathian Basin’ discourse serves as a symbolic battleground for different political ideologies to indicate both neutral geographical references and nationalist sentiments. Left-liberals tend to use it politically neutrally, referring to an ethno-culturally heterogeneous area, and using a less personal voice, referring to institutions and interests. In contrast, right-wing narratives often demarcate the Carpathian Basin as a single geographical entity. Some of these speeches exhibit virtual nationalism, while others subtly question territorial legitimacy. The latter MPs speak in terms of representing their own community, referring to values, emotions, and culture, offering a collective identity to which people attach values and emotions. 
651 4 |a Carpathian Basin 
653 |a Language 
653 |a Geography 
653 |a Science 
653 |a Geopolitics 
653 |a Research centers 
653 |a Data mining 
653 |a Politics 
653 |a Political ideologies 
653 |a National identity 
653 |a Speeches 
653 |a Emotions 
653 |a Natural language processing 
653 |a Regional studies 
653 |a Legitimacy 
653 |a Nationalism 
653 |a Parliaments 
653 |a Political discourse 
653 |a Social sciences 
653 |a Legislatures 
653 |a Social research 
653 |a Discourse 
653 |a Text analysis 
653 |a Group identity 
653 |a Cultural identity 
653 |a Right wing politics 
653 |a Word meaning 
700 1 |a Katona, Eszter 
700 1 |a Balogh, Péter 
700 1 |a Rakovics, Zsófia 
700 1 |a Unger, Anna 
773 0 |t Intersections  |g vol. 11, no. 1 (2025), p. 3-40 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Political Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3255466665/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3255466665/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch