Investigating Problem-Based Worksheets (PBWs) to Improve Understanding in Logic Gates Topic: Stacking and Racking Analyses in Rasch Model

Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Cyhoeddwyd yn:Educational Process: International Journal vol. 16 (2025), p. e2025243
Prif Awdur: Utami, Nisaudzakiah
Awduron Eraill: Setiawan, Agus, Hamidah, Ida, Koehler, Thomas
Cyhoeddwyd:
UNIVERSITEPARK Limited
Pynciau:
Mynediad Ar-lein:Citation/Abstract
Full text outside of ProQuest
Tagiau: Ychwanegu Tag
Dim Tagiau, Byddwch y cyntaf i dagio'r cofnod hwn!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3257424428
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2147-0901 
035 |a 3257424428 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a EJ1483307 
100 1 |a Utami, Nisaudzakiah 
245 1 |a Investigating Problem-Based Worksheets (PBWs) to Improve Understanding in Logic Gates Topic: Stacking and Racking Analyses in Rasch Model 
260 |b UNIVERSITEPARK Limited  |c 2025 
513 |a Report Article 
520 3 |a Background/purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of Problem-Based Worksheets (PBWs) in improving conceptual understanding of logic gates. PBWs were designed with key characteristics that integrate authentic problem-solving, active student engagement, and conceptual scaffolding to support critical thinking processes. A total of 32 vocational high school (VHS) students in Indonesia were involved in the PBWs class. Materials/methods: This study employed a quantitative quasiexperimental one-group pretest-posttest design to examine the effects of PBWs on students' conceptual understanding. The intervention was conducted for 90 minutes, and 90 minutes for pre- and post-tests. Data were analyzed using stacking and racking within the Rasch model to measure changes in students' understanding and item characteristics. Results: The results significantly improved students' conceptual understanding of logic gates after the PBWs intervention. Due to nonnormal data distribution and small sample size (n = 32), Mann--Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests were used, both confirming statistically significant score increases (p < 0.05). Rasch analysis further supported this improvement, with a logit difference of -7.14 between pre- and posttests. Racking analysis revealed that item difficulty shifted, particularly for items 3, 5, 6, and 8. Despite overall gains, anomalies such as guessing, cheating, and carelessness influenced some students' results, as detected through response patterns and scalogram analysis. ConclusionL This study concluded that PBWs effectively improved students' conceptual understanding of logic gates in pneumatic. PBWs offered a more engaging and holistic learning experience. These findings highlight the need for consideration of student behaviour during testing to ensure accurate interpretation of educational outcomes. 
651 4 |a Indonesia 
653 |a Problem Based Learning 
653 |a Worksheets 
653 |a Item Response Theory 
653 |a Models 
653 |a Electronic Equipment 
653 |a Problem Solving 
653 |a Active Learning 
653 |a Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) 
653 |a Career and Technical Education Schools 
653 |a High Schools 
653 |a High School Students 
653 |a Intervention 
653 |a Instructional Effectiveness 
653 |a Holistic Approach 
653 |a Learning Experience 
653 |a Student Behavior 
653 |a Testing 
653 |a Learner Engagement 
653 |a Difficulty Level 
653 |a Foreign Countries 
700 1 |a Setiawan, Agus 
700 1 |a Hamidah, Ida 
700 1 |a Koehler, Thomas 
773 0 |t Educational Process: International Journal  |g vol. 16 (2025), p. e2025243 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ERIC 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3257424428/abstract/embedded/H09TXR3UUZB2ISDL?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full text outside of ProQuest  |u http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1483307