Agreement and repeatability of ocular surface function using the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp compared with Keratograph 5M

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group) vol. 15, no. 1 (2025), p. 34992-34998
Autor principal: Su, Linlin
Otros Autores: Yu, Tingting, Chen, Jiayan, Yang, Fan, Zhang, Qiuyue, Xu, Ling, He, Wei, Qin, Guanghao, Zhang, Hongda
Publicado:
Nature Publishing Group
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3258273603
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2045-2322 
024 7 |a 10.1038/s41598-025-18904-z  |2 doi 
035 |a 3258273603 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
084 |a 274855  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Su, Linlin  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China; Department of Ophthalmology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China (ROR: https://ror.org/04c8eg608) (GRID: grid.411971.b) (ISNI: 0000 0000 9558 1426) 
245 1 |a Agreement and repeatability of ocular surface function using the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp compared with Keratograph 5M 
260 |b Nature Publishing Group  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a To evaluate the agreement and repeatability of the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp (S390L WDR+D130, MediWorks, Shanghai, China)   in tear film-related parameters measurement compared with Keratograph 5M(K5M) (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). This prospective study assessed tear film parameters, including first non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUTf), average non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUTav), and tear meniscus height (TMH) using the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp and K5M. Bland-Altman (BA) plots and the correlation coefficient r were used to assess the agreement of tear film parameters of two ocular surface analyzers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the repeatability of the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp and K5M. Forty-four subjects from Shenyang He Eye Specialist Hospital were recruited in this study. There were no significant differences in the paired comparisons of NIBUTf, NIBUTav, and TMH (p > 0.05). The BA plots analysis showed a good agreement between the two devices for the NIBUTf (95% LoA, − 2.7 to 2.6), NIBUTav (95% LoA, − 4.5 to 3.6) and TMH (95% LoA, − 0.05 to 0.04). ICC of NIBUTf, NIBUTav, and TMH between the two measurements using S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp was 0.89, 0.84, and 0.98, respectively. The tear film-related parameters measurement of S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp had good repeatability and acceptable agreement with K5M. This study suggested a novel technique S390L Firefly WDR slitlampcan be considered an alternative to K5M in clinical settings, with an acceptable level of intrasession repeatability for clinical evaluation of tear film parameters. 
653 |a Agreements 
653 |a Confidence intervals 
653 |a Cornea 
653 |a Correlation coefficient 
653 |a Statistical analysis 
653 |a Environmental 
700 1 |a Yu, Tingting  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China; Department of Ophthalmology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China (ROR: https://ror.org/04c8eg608) (GRID: grid.411971.b) (ISNI: 0000 0000 9558 1426) 
700 1 |a Chen, Jiayan  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a Yang, Fan  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a Zhang, Qiuyue  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a Xu, Ling  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a He, Wei  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a Qin, Guanghao  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
700 1 |a Zhang, Hongda  |u Department of Clinical Research, He Eye Specialist Hospital, 110034, Shenyang, China 
773 0 |t Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group)  |g vol. 15, no. 1 (2025), p. 34992-34998 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3258273603/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3258273603/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3258273603/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch