Project management maturity in project-based organizations: frameworks, drivers, and the role of sustainability

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Future Business Journal vol. 11, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 245
Autor principal: Al-Marri, Rashid
Otros Autores: Abdalla, Galal, Mahdi, Elsadig
Publicado:
Springer Nature B.V.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3260580326
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2314-7202 
022 |a 2314-7210 
024 7 |a 10.1186/s43093-025-00670-z  |2 doi 
035 |a 3260580326 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Al-Marri, Rashid  |u Qatar University, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.412603.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0634 1084) 
245 1 |a Project management maturity in project-based organizations: frameworks, drivers, and the role of sustainability 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Project management maturity models (PMMMs) provide structured approaches to evaluate and enhance project alignment with strategic and sustainability goals. We conducted a PRISMA-aligned systematic review of project management (PM) maturity in project-based organizations (PBOs) from 2010 to 2023, utilizing Scopus as the primary database, with supplementary searches in ProQuest and Google Scholar. PBOs play a key role in delivering infrastructure, energy, environmental initiatives that impact natural and socio-economic systems. Across the literature, sustainability emerges as a critical driver of maturity, with models like SPM3, PSM3, and the Sustainable Project Management Cube integrating economic, environmental, social indicators. Unlike traditional PMMMs, which focus on cost, time, and scope, these models integrate sustainability throughout the project lifecycle and provide prescriptive tools to support long-term resilience. Our findings indicate that while PM maturity models are crucial for performance in PBOs, their unique operational context necessitates models tailored to six key drivers: sustainability, structured frameworks, benchmarking, strategy formulation, continuous improvement, and technological advancement. Additionally, the maturation pathways differ between enterprise and intelligent PBOs, highlighting the need for adaptive, context-sensitive maturity assessments. 
610 4 |a International Project Management Association Project Management Institute 
653 |a Best practice 
653 |a Project management 
653 |a Success 
653 |a Sustainable development 
653 |a Research & development--R&D 
653 |a Strategic planning 
653 |a Software engineering 
653 |a Efficiency 
653 |a System theory 
653 |a Portfolio management 
700 1 |a Abdalla, Galal  |u Qatar University, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.412603.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0634 1084) 
700 1 |a Mahdi, Elsadig  |u Qatar University, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.412603.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0634 1084) 
773 0 |t Future Business Journal  |g vol. 11, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 245 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t ABI/INFORM Global 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3260580326/abstract/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3260580326/fulltext/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3260580326/fulltextPDF/embedded/J7RWLIQ9I3C9JK51?source=fedsrch