Integrating scientific data, local knowledge, and expert knowledge to assess climate vulnerability in fisheries
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Ecology and Society vol. 30, no. 4 (Oct 2025) |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | , , , |
| Publicado: |
Resilience Alliance
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3264563435 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1708-3087 | ||
| 022 | |a 1195-5449 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5751/ES-16567-300414 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3264563435 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20251001 |b d20251031 | |
| 084 | |a 55194 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Li, Yunzhou | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Integrating scientific data, local knowledge, and expert knowledge to assess climate vulnerability in fisheries | |
| 260 | |b Resilience Alliance |c Oct 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The complementary nature of diverse knowledge systems is increasingly recognized as essential for addressing climate challenges in fisheries management. However, current theoretical frameworks often oversimplify knowledge production and integration as a linear tool, overlooking its complexity, interpretative nuances, and inherent uncertainties. This study evaluated and integrated scientific data, institutional expert knowledge, and fishermen’s local knowledge to examine the differences and synergies that emerged from employing these diverse knowledge forms to assess social and ecological vulnerability in fisheries under climate change impacts. China is the world’s largest fishing nation, with fisheries increasingly vulnerable to climate change. It also presents a unique context to examine how science and different forms of knowledge inform decision-making, given its distinct governance structure and data environment. Using a case study from China, we conducted desktop research, surveys of experts, and interviews with fishermen to compare assessment outcomes across approaches. Our findings demonstrate that data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches can yield different results in climate vulnerability assessments (CVAs). We identify four key factors that influence these discrepancies, including (1) varying levels of individual familiarity, expertise, and research efforts across species; (2) divergences in the use of assessment indicators and scoring criteria; (3) data and knowledge gaps related to species biological traits and fisheries socioeconomics; and (4) uncertainties stemming from data quality and knowledge confidence. These findings highlight the critical strengths and limitations of different knowledge forms in informing climate vulnerabilities and offer actionable strategies to enhance collaborative efforts and participatory CVAs to build climate-resilient fisheries. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a China | |
| 653 | |a Climate change | ||
| 653 | |a Environmental assessment | ||
| 653 | |a Socioeconomic factors | ||
| 653 | |a Fisheries | ||
| 653 | |a Fishermen | ||
| 653 | |a Familiarity | ||
| 653 | |a Local knowledge | ||
| 653 | |a Data quality | ||
| 653 | |a Decision making | ||
| 653 | |a Uncertainty | ||
| 653 | |a Fisheries management | ||
| 653 | |a Environmental impact | ||
| 653 | |a Case studies | ||
| 653 | |a Scientific knowledge | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge | ||
| 653 | |a Vulnerability | ||
| 653 | |a Knowledge based development | ||
| 653 | |a Governance | ||
| 653 | |a Evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Fishing | ||
| 653 | |a Change agents | ||
| 653 | |a Discrepancies | ||
| 653 | |a Scores | ||
| 653 | |a Environmental | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Kleisner, Kristin | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mills, Katherine E | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ren, Yiping | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Yong | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Ecology and Society |g vol. 30, no. 4 (Oct 2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Agriculture Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264563435/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264563435/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264563435/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |