Impact of Dose‐Escalation Design on the Safety and Development of Anticancer Drugs in Clinical Trials

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
में प्रकाशित:Clinical and Translational Science vol. 18, no. 10 (Oct 1, 2025)
मुख्य लेखक: Nonami, Atsushi
अन्य लेखक: Matsuda, Kensuke, Funakoshi, Kouta, Kato, Ryosuke, Takahashi, Hideaki, Edahiro, Yoko
प्रकाशित:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3264772763
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1752-8054 
022 |a 1752-8062 
024 7 |a 10.1111/cts.70367  |2 doi 
035 |a 3264772763 
045 0 |b d20251001 
084 |a 210331  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Nonami, Atsushi  |u Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan 
245 1 |a Impact of Dose‐Escalation Design on the Safety and Development of Anticancer Drugs in Clinical Trials 
260 |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  |c Oct 1, 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a ABSTRACT The operational characteristics of dose‐escalation design in phase I studies have been studied using simulations; however, there is limited analysis regarding its effects on the results of clinical trials. We collected the data of 394 clinical trials involving dose‐escalation studies for anticancer drugs submitted to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency between 2013 and 2022. We used the internal data of the PMDA and published papers and analyzed outcomes such as enrollment and drug development. We identified model‐based designs and rule‐based designs as the two primary designs. The median number of dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT)‐evaluated patients was higher for model‐based designs than for rule‐based designs. The proportion of rule‐based designs was higher in Japanese trials and that of model‐based designs was higher in multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs). The determined recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was consistent with the approved dose in all trials (13/13) involving model‐based designs and in 84.0% (21/25) of trials involving rule‐based designs, although it was not statistically significant. The proportion of progression to the next study phase was 50.0% (61/122) for rule‐based designs and 56.3% (36/64) for model‐based designs. Similar trends in these outcomes were observed when MRCTs and Japanese trials were examined separately. Model‐based designs might require more DLT‐evaluated patients; however, they might have different operational capabilities compared with rule‐based designs, such as selecting an RP2D consistent with the approved dose. The results might help in selecting the optimal dose‐escalation methods in future phase I trials. 
651 4 |a Japan 
653 |a Cancer 
653 |a Enrollments 
653 |a Clinical trials 
653 |a Monoclonal antibodies 
653 |a Simulation 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Toxicity 
653 |a Regression analysis 
653 |a Pharmacodynamics 
653 |a Medical equipment 
653 |a Cytotoxicity 
653 |a Pharmaceuticals 
653 |a Regulatory approval 
653 |a Antineoplastic drugs 
653 |a Variables 
653 |a Drug development 
653 |a Statistical analysis 
653 |a Patients 
653 |a Hematology 
653 |a Drug dosages 
700 1 |a Matsuda, Kensuke  |u Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan 
700 1 |a Funakoshi, Kouta  |u Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan 
700 1 |a Kato, Ryosuke  |u Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan 
700 1 |a Takahashi, Hideaki  |u Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan 
700 1 |a Edahiro, Yoko  |u Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan 
773 0 |t Clinical and Translational Science  |g vol. 18, no. 10 (Oct 1, 2025) 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264772763/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264772763/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3264772763/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch