Algorithmic Charisma Under Strain: Elon Musk and the Dynamics of Founder Myths in the Platform Era
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Administrative Sciences vol. 15, no. 10 (2025), p. 394-411 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3265804934 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 2076-3387 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/admsci15100394 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3265804934 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231329 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Madsen, Dag Øivind | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Algorithmic Charisma Under Strain: Elon Musk and the Dynamics of Founder Myths in the Platform Era | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a This paper introduces the concept of algorithmic charisma to explain how leadership authority is sustained through visibility, virality, and platform amplification. Using Elon Musk as an illustrative case, it examines “Muskism”—the evolving set of myths, narratives, and symbolic performances that surround Musk and his ventures. Based on publicly available material from 2008 to 2025, the study applies four complementary lenses: charismatic authority, media mythmaking and ritual, organizational cult dynamics, and scapegoating/sacrificial mechanisms. The analysis traces Muskism’s trajectory across four phases—myth construction, polarization and institutionalization, charismatic decay, and symbolic reconfiguration—showing how founder myths are built, contested, and adapted in the platform era. The central contribution is the articulation of algorithmic charisma as a distinct form of founder authority, sustained less by stable belief than by recursive cycles of digital visibility. In doing so, the essay advances understanding of founder-led leadership cultures, highlighting the durability of early mythic framing, the role of audience segmentation in sustaining charisma, and the value of integrating multiple theoretical perspectives in interpretive organizational research. | |
| 653 | |a Leadership | ||
| 653 | |a Sociology | ||
| 653 | |a Charisma | ||
| 653 | |a Hypothesis testing | ||
| 653 | |a Legitimacy | ||
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Capitalism | ||
| 653 | |a Narratives | ||
| 653 | |a Corporate identity | ||
| 653 | |a Symbolism | ||
| 653 | |a Market segmentation | ||
| 653 | |a Polarization | ||
| 653 | |a Scapegoating | ||
| 653 | |a Recursion | ||
| 653 | |a Mythology | ||
| 653 | |a Organizational research | ||
| 653 | |a Visibility | ||
| 653 | |a Institutionalization | ||
| 653 | |a Authority | ||
| 653 | |a Ventures | ||
| 653 | |a Rituals | ||
| 653 | |a Segmentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Administrative Sciences |g vol. 15, no. 10 (2025), p. 394-411 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3265804934/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3265804934/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3265804934/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |