Addressing Data Imbalance in Hydrological Machine Learning: Impact of Advanced Sampling Methods on Performance and Interpretability
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | Water Resources Research vol. 61, no. 10 (Oct 1, 2025) |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| מחברים אחרים: | , , , , , , |
| יצא לאור: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| תגים: |
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3266095095 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0043-1397 | ||
| 022 | |a 1944-7973 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1029/2024WR039848 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3266095095 | ||
| 045 | 0 | |b d20251001 | |
| 084 | |a 107315 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yin, Xiaoran |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Addressing Data Imbalance in Hydrological Machine Learning: Impact of Advanced Sampling Methods on Performance and Interpretability | |
| 260 | |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |c Oct 1, 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Data imbalance poses a severe challenge in hydrological machine learning (ML) applications by limiting model performance and interpretability, whereas solutions remain limited. This study evaluates the impact of advanced sampling methods, particularly feature space coverage sampling (FSCS), on model performance in predicting forest cover types and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks); mechanism underlying its efficacy; and impact on model interpretability. Using ML algorithms such as random forest (RF) and LightGBM (LGB) across various training set sizes, we demonstrated that FSCS significantly mitigates data imbalance, enhancing model accuracy, feature importance estimation, and interpretability. Two widely used hydrological data sets were analyzed: a large multiclass forest cover type data set from Roosevelt National Forest (110,393 samples) and continuous‐value data set of soil properties from the USKSAT database (18,729 samples). In total, 1,720 models were constructed and optimized, combining different sampling methods, training set sizes, and algorithms. Balanced sampling, conditioned Latin hypercube sampling, and FSCS consistently outperformed simple random sampling. Despite using smaller training sets and simpler RF models, FSCS‐trained models matched or surpassed the performance of those using larger data sets or more complex LGB models. SHAP analysis revealed that FSCS enhanced feature–target relationship clarity, emphasizing feature interactions and improving model interpretability. These findings highlight the potential of advanced sampling methods for not only addressing data imbalance but also providing more accurate prior information for model training, thereby enhancing reliability, accuracy, and interpretability in ML for hydrological applications. | |
| 653 | |a Hydrologic data | ||
| 653 | |a Datasets | ||
| 653 | |a Algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Sampling methods | ||
| 653 | |a Soil properties | ||
| 653 | |a Hydraulic conductivity | ||
| 653 | |a Hydrology | ||
| 653 | |a Machine learning | ||
| 653 | |a Hypercubes | ||
| 653 | |a Random sampling | ||
| 653 | |a Performance evaluation | ||
| 653 | |a Learning algorithms | ||
| 653 | |a Contamination | ||
| 653 | |a Accuracy | ||
| 653 | |a Soil sciences | ||
| 653 | |a Training | ||
| 653 | |a Groundwater | ||
| 653 | |a Statistical sampling | ||
| 653 | |a Decision making | ||
| 653 | |a National forests | ||
| 653 | |a Hydraulics | ||
| 653 | |a Latin hypercube sampling | ||
| 653 | |a Environmental | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Shu, Longcang |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Zhe |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Long |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Niu, Shuyao |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ren, Huazhun |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, Bo |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lu, Chengpeng |u The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, China | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Water Resources Research |g vol. 61, no. 10 (Oct 1, 2025) | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t ABI/INFORM Global | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266095095/abstract/embedded/Y2VX53961LHR7RE6?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266095095/fulltext/embedded/Y2VX53961LHR7RE6?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266095095/fulltextPDF/embedded/Y2VX53961LHR7RE6?source=fedsrch |