Reliability of educational attainment of survey respondents: an overlooked barrier to comparability?

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications vol. 12, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 1651
Autor principal: Briceno-Rosas, Roberto
Publicado em:
Springer Nature B.V.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3266729266
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2662-9992 
022 |a 2055-1045 
024 7 |a 10.1057/s41599-025-06051-9  |2 doi 
035 |a 3266729266 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Briceno-Rosas, Roberto  |u GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany (GRID:grid.425053.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1013 1176); University of Mannheim, School of Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany (GRID:grid.5601.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 599X) 
245 1 |a Reliability of educational attainment of survey respondents: an overlooked barrier to comparability? 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Educational attainment is vital in social science research for analysing socioeconomic inequalities, labour market outcomes, and health disparities. Harmonisation schemes such as the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) and its survey-specific adaptation EDULVLB aim to standardise educational classifications across countries, enabling international comparability. Despite their widespread use, concerns persist regarding the reliability of these harmonised measures, particularly at the individual level and across different survey modes. This study evaluates the reliability of harmonised educational attainment measurements using test-retest data from Estonia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom. Respondents’ answers from the face-to-face European Social Survey Round 8 (2016) and the online CRONOS Panel Wave 6 (2018) were analysed, with reliability coefficients estimated for both the one-digit ISCED and the more detailed EDULVLB classification. The results reveal notable individual-level inconsistencies, especially in the United Kingdom, challenging assumptions of high reliability in harmonised education data. Inconsistencies were most common between adjacent educational levels, suggesting difficulties distinguishing similar qualifications. Device effects were also observed, with smartphone users displaying lower consistency than computers or tablets users. While mode effects could not be fully disentangled from measurement error, the findings underscore the need for systematic reliability assessments and improved instrument design to ensure the comparability and validity of educational measures in cross-national survey research. 
610 4 |a United Nations Educational Scientific & Cultural Organization 
653 |a Health disparities 
653 |a Measurement 
653 |a Polls & surveys 
653 |a Socioeconomic factors 
653 |a Validity 
653 |a Classification 
653 |a Individual differences 
653 |a Health status 
653 |a Computers 
653 |a Variables 
653 |a Design 
653 |a Social research 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Educational attainment 
653 |a Labor market 
653 |a Social sciences 
653 |a Education 
653 |a Handheld computers 
653 |a Validation studies 
653 |a Measures 
653 |a Measurement errors 
653 |a Harmonization 
653 |a Social inequality 
653 |a Respondents 
653 |a Attainment 
653 |a Inequality 
653 |a Qualifications 
773 0 |t Humanities & Social Sciences Communications  |g vol. 12, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 1651 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Social Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266729266/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266729266/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3266729266/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch