Effectiveness of virtual reality-based training in clinical skills for newly graduated nurses
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | Nurse Education in Practice vol. 88 (Oct 2025), p. 104587-104594 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Altres autors: | , , , , |
| Publicat: |
Elsevier Limited
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetes: |
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
|
| Resum: | Aim This study compares the impact of virtual reality (VR) training versus conventional e-learning on newly graduated nurses (NGNs) learning six core clinical skills. We primarily assessed self-efficacy, along with secondary outcomes including knowledge, skills and satisfaction, while also identifying factors that influence self-efficacy. Background NGNs need strong self-efficacy and skills for clinical transitions. VR’s immersive training potential is promising, but its long-term impact versus traditional methods is unclear due to mixed evidence. Design Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test with a comparison group and three-month follow-up. Methods 150 NGNs at a Taiwanese medical center were assigned to VR (n = 75) or e-learning (n = 75) groups via alternating cohorts. Both received physical skills training post-online modules. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T1), post-physical training (T2) and three months (T3) using the General Self-Efficacy Scale, cognitive questionnaire, Direct Observation of Procedural Skills and satisfaction scale. Mixed-design ANOVA and regression analyzed data, with last observation carried forward for attrition. Results No significant Time*Group interactions were found for self-efficacy (p = 0.970), cognitive knowledge (p = 0.459), clinical skills (p = 0.741), or satisfaction (p = 0.245), showing VR was not superior. Significant Time effects (p < 0.001) indicated T1-to-T2 gains, with declines at T3 for self-efficacy and cognition. Baseline self-efficacy and T3 satisfaction predicted T3 self-efficacy (R²=0.215). Attrition was 42.7 % by T3. Conclusions VR training did not outperform e-learning over three months. Both supported short-term gains, but sustaining these requires further strategies. Baseline self-efficacy and satisfaction are key predictors. Future studies should address attrition and optimize VR designs for NGNs. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1471-5953 1873-5223 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104587 |
| Font: | Sociology Database |