STRATEGIC DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES: A CASE STUDY OF KOH KRET, THAILAND
Sábháilte in:
| Foilsithe in: | Lex Localis vol. 23, no. S6 (2025), p. 3558-3569 |
|---|---|
| Príomhchruthaitheoir: | |
| Rannpháirtithe: | , , , , |
| Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: |
Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor
|
| Ábhair: | |
| Rochtain ar líne: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Clibeanna: |
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3271152422 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1581-5374 | ||
| 022 | |a 1855-363X | ||
| 035 | |a 3271152422 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 116116 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Somthawinpongsai, Chanyanan |u Journalism and Communication, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Shinawatar University, Thailand 0000-0002-1651-196X | |
| 245 | 1 | |a STRATEGIC DIGITAL COMMUNICATION AND PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES: A CASE STUDY OF KOH KRET, THAILAND | |
| 260 | |b Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The project objectives were to (1) develop a digital platform for product distribution, (2) identify successful digital marketing strategies for community-based organic agricultural enterprises in Ko Kret, Nonthaburi, and (3) determine users' satisfaction with the platform. This mixed-methods research used a user survey, participant observation, and in-depth interviews and developed a web app. The site was built using an ongoing community engagement approach to ensure it was user-friendly and responsive across devices. The results indicated that local businesses that wish to succeed in digital marketing should focus on improving their use of technology, including using social media to build brand awareness around local stories and networking with other organizations to reach more people. The key components of the developed platform include mobile compatibility and chatbot integration. The production of custom content and the enhancement of the UX/UI app were driven by community participation in content development and usability testing. This is because community members can add contextual community data and acceptability. To assess the app's efficacy depending on content quality (mean = 4.33, SD = 0.51), system performance (mean = 4.32, SD = 0.53), and user experience (mean = 4.34, SD = 0.51), a sample of 400 respondents was surveyed; all three variables significantly affected the satisfaction with using the app. The website features were visual appeal (Mean = 4.45) and mobile utility (Mean = 4.35). Real-world results show that educating stakeholders about technology, integrating them into the process, and continuous learning are important. New research should focus on big data analytics, mobile app development, and AI-driven customization to promote digital trade in the local area in the long run. | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Thailand | |
| 653 | |a Local businesses | ||
| 653 | |a Consumer behavior | ||
| 653 | |a Community involvement | ||
| 653 | |a Agribusiness | ||
| 653 | |a Companies | ||
| 653 | |a Efficacy | ||
| 653 | |a Data quality | ||
| 653 | |a Economic growth | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural research | ||
| 653 | |a Acceptability | ||
| 653 | |a Marketing | ||
| 653 | |a Human-computer interaction | ||
| 653 | |a Social media | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural development | ||
| 653 | |a Case studies | ||
| 653 | |a Digital marketing | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural technology | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural economics | ||
| 653 | |a Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Networking | ||
| 653 | |a Satisfaction | ||
| 653 | |a Internet | ||
| 653 | |a User experience | ||
| 653 | |a Brands | ||
| 653 | |a Social networks | ||
| 653 | |a Mass media | ||
| 653 | |a Polls & surveys | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Agriculture | ||
| 653 | |a Big Data | ||
| 653 | |a Participant observation | ||
| 653 | |a Agricultural production | ||
| 653 | |a Respondents | ||
| 653 | |a Rural communities | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Ngernlad, Warin |u Faculty of Liberal Arts, Shinawatar University, Thailand 0009-0000-5262-3777 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Qiwen, Chen |u Faculty of Education, Shinawatra University 0009-0003-6209-7362 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shyong, Alex Leong Swee |u Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University 0000-0002-9709-6242 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tee, Mcxin |u Faculty of Business and Communications, INTI International University, 71800 Nilai, Malaysia. 0000-0001-7990-8377 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lu, Liangyan | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Lex Localis |g vol. 23, no. S6 (2025), p. 3558-3569 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Political Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271152422/abstract/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271152422/fulltext/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271152422/fulltextPDF/embedded/6A8EOT78XXH2IG52?source=fedsrch |