Prioritization of autonomous marine vehicle communication technologies using the VIKOR

I tiakina i:
Ngā taipitopito rārangi puna kōrero
I whakaputaina i:Applied Water Science vol. 15, no. 12 (Dec 2025), p. 296
Kaituhi matua: Le, Yang
Ētahi atu kaituhi: Alam, Mohammad Mahtab, Shafieezadeh, M. Mehdi
I whakaputaina:
Springer Nature B.V.
Ngā marau:
Urunga tuihono:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Ngā Tūtohu: Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3271247618
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2190-5487 
022 |a 2190-5495 
024 7 |a 10.1007/s13201-025-02652-6  |2 doi 
035 |a 3271247618 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
084 |a 242435  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Le, Yang  |u Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, School of Internet of Things, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.453246.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0369 3615) 
245 1 |a Prioritization of autonomous marine vehicle communication technologies using the VIKOR 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Reliable and efficient communication technologies are essential for the effective operation of autonomous marine vehicles (AMVs) in harsh and dynamic environments. This study evaluated five communication technology alternatives: Satellite, Radio Frequency (RF), Acoustic, Optical, and Hybrid Systems using the VIKOR method, a robust multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique. The evaluation was based on expert-derived assessments across five key criteria: transmission range, data transfer rate, reliability, environmental adaptability, and cost efficiency. The results revealed that Hybrid Systems achieved the lowest compromise index (Q = 0.28), indicating the most balanced and robust performance. Acoustic communication followed closely with a Q value of 0.36, demonstrating strong adaptability and reliability, especially in underwater applications. Satellite (Q = 0.44) and RF (Q = 0.49) technologies occupied intermediate ranks, showing potential in specific scenarios depending on coverage and range requirements. Optical communication, with a Q value of 0.61, consistently ranked last due to its high sensitivity to environmental conditions, such as turbidity, and its limited range. Sensitivity analysis conducted by varying the decision-making parameter υ from 0.3 to 0.7 confirmed the robustness of the results, with Hybrid Systems consistently maintaining the top position. These findings offer clear, data-driven guidance for stakeholders in selecting communication systems that ensure resilient and efficient AMV operations across various maritime missions. 
653 |a Data transfer (computers) 
653 |a Adaptability 
653 |a Sensitivity analysis 
653 |a Multiple criterion 
653 |a Communication technology 
653 |a Parameter sensitivity 
653 |a Turbidity 
653 |a Reliability 
653 |a Questionnaires 
653 |a Environmental conditions 
653 |a Satellites 
653 |a Decision support systems 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Telecommunications 
653 |a Marine technology 
653 |a Robustness 
653 |a Efficiency 
653 |a Autonomous vehicles 
653 |a Multiple criteria decision making 
653 |a Communications systems 
653 |a Power supply 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Hybrid systems 
653 |a Acoustics 
653 |a Radio frequency 
653 |a Economic 
700 1 |a Alam, Mohammad Mahtab  |u King Khalid University, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, Abha, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.412144.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1790 7100) 
700 1 |a Shafieezadeh, M. Mehdi  |u Islamic Azad University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Shiraz, Iran (GRID:grid.449257.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0494 2636) 
773 0 |t Applied Water Science  |g vol. 15, no. 12 (Dec 2025), p. 296 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Publicly Available Content Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271247618/abstract/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271247618/fulltext/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271247618/fulltextPDF/embedded/L8HZQI7Z43R0LA5T?source=fedsrch