Computational Modelling of a Prestressed Tensegrity Core in a Sandwich Panel
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Materials vol. 18, no. 21 (2025), p. 4880-4895 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Otros Autores: | |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text + Graphics Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3271547997 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 1996-1944 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/ma18214880 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a 3271547997 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20250101 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 231532 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pełczyński Jan | |
| 245 | 1 | |a Computational Modelling of a Prestressed Tensegrity Core in a Sandwich Panel | |
| 260 | |b MDPI AG |c 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Journal Article | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Tensegrity structures, by definition composed of compressed members suspended in a network of tensile cables, are characterised by a high strength-to-weight ratio and the ability to undergo reversible deformations. Their application as cores of sandwich panels represents an innovative approach to lightweight design, enabling the regulation of mechanical properties while reducing material consumption. This study presents a finite element modelling procedure that combines analytical determination of prestress using singular value decomposition with implementation in the ABAQUS™ 2019 software. Geometry generation and prestress definitions were automated with Python 3 scripts, while algebraic analysis of individual modules was performed in Wolfram Mathematica. Two models were investigated: M1, composed of four identical modules, and M2, composed of four modules arranged in two mirrored pairs. Model M1 exhibited a linear elastic response with a constant global stiffness of 13.9 kN/mm, stable regardless of the prestress level. Model M2 showed nonlinear hardening behaviour with variable stiffness ranging from 0.135 to 1.1 kN/mm and required prestress to ensure static stability. Eigenvalue analysis confirmed the full stability of M1 and the increase in stability of M2 upon the introduction of prestress. The proposed method enables precise control of prestress distribution, which is crucial for the stability and stiffness of tensegrity structures. The M2 configuration, due to its sensitivity to prestress and variable stiffness, is particularly promising as an adaptive sandwich panel core in morphing structures, adaptive building systems, and deployable constructions. | |
| 653 | |a Load | ||
| 653 | |a Finite element method | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Stiffness | ||
| 653 | |a Civil engineering | ||
| 653 | |a Mechanical properties | ||
| 653 | |a Elastic properties | ||
| 653 | |a Decomposition | ||
| 653 | |a Algebra | ||
| 653 | |a Modules | ||
| 653 | |a Boundary conditions | ||
| 653 | |a Composite materials | ||
| 653 | |a Smart structures | ||
| 653 | |a Sandwich panels | ||
| 653 | |a Eigenvalues | ||
| 653 | |a Tensegrity structures | ||
| 653 | |a Static stability | ||
| 653 | |a Adaptive systems | ||
| 653 | |a Singular value decomposition | ||
| 653 | |a Cables | ||
| 653 | |a Morphing | ||
| 653 | |a Prestressing | ||
| 653 | |a Strength to weight ratio | ||
| 653 | |a Design | ||
| 653 | |a Mathematical models | ||
| 653 | |a Deformation | ||
| 653 | |a Geometry | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Martyniuk-Sienkiewicz Kamila | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Materials |g vol. 18, no. 21 (2025), p. 4880-4895 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Materials Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271547997/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text + Graphics |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271547997/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3271547997/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch |