Application of FAHP–QFD–NLP Hybrid Decision Model in Assessment of Priority Strategies of Corporate Sustainability

-д хадгалсан:
Номзүйн дэлгэрэнгүй
-д хэвлэсэн:International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems vol. 18, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 297
Үндсэн зохиолч: Huang, Yin-Yin
Бусад зохиолчид: Lin, Tsai-Sung, Pan, Jingchao, Nguyen, Minh T. N., Tsaur, Ruey-Chyn
Хэвлэсэн:
Springer Nature B.V.
Нөхцлүүд:
Онлайн хандалт:Citation/Abstract
Full Text
Full Text - PDF
Шошгууд: Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3272862200
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1875-6891 
022 |a 1875-6883 
024 7 |a 10.1007/s44196-025-01031-y  |2 doi 
035 |a 3272862200 
045 2 |b d20251201  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Huang, Yin-Yin  |u Nanchang Vocational University, School of Economics and Management, Nanchang City, China 
245 1 |a Application of FAHP–QFD–NLP Hybrid Decision Model in Assessment of Priority Strategies of Corporate Sustainability 
260 |b Springer Nature B.V.  |c Dec 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a This study presents a structured decision-making framework to evaluate and prioritize corporate sustainability actions under the triple bottom line, encompassing economic performance, social value, and environmental responsibility. First, we use fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine the relative importance of sub-criteria across TBL dimensions based on expert judgments and selection. Second, we use quality function deployment to translate those weighted priorities into ranked indicators by the house of quality. Finally, using natural language processing, we employ BERT semantic similarity models and assess the alignment between the model’s recommended actions and actual corporate sustainability disclosures across 10 publicly listed companies. The integrated framework enables a systematic comparison between ideal strategic priorities and practical implementation. By aggregating expert-derived priorities and disclosure-based alignment, the model provides a quantitative basis for benchmarking firms and identifying gaps between intention and action. This approach offers a replicable, data-driven method for evaluating corporate sustainability strategies within the TBL structure. 
610 4 |a United Nations--UN 
653 |a Social responsibility 
653 |a Corporate culture 
653 |a Alignment 
653 |a Analytic hierarchy process 
653 |a Environmental social & governance 
653 |a Fuzzy sets 
653 |a Sustainability 
653 |a Sustainable development 
653 |a Priorities 
653 |a Stockholders 
653 |a Decision making 
653 |a Supply chains 
653 |a Compliance 
653 |a Stakeholders 
653 |a Objectives 
653 |a Natural language processing 
653 |a Risk management 
653 |a Strategic planning 
653 |a Quality function deployment 
653 |a Investors 
653 |a Value creation 
700 1 |a Lin, Tsai-Sung  |u Tamkang University, Department of Management Sciences, New Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.264580.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1055) 
700 1 |a Pan, Jingchao  |u Jiujiang Polytechnic University of Science and Technology, Gongqing City, China (GRID:grid.264580.d) 
700 1 |a Nguyen, Minh T. N.  |u University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University HCM, Faculty of Business Administration, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (GRID:grid.264580.d) 
700 1 |a Tsaur, Ruey-Chyn  |u Tamkang University, Department of Management Sciences, New Taipei City, Taiwan (GRID:grid.264580.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 1055) 
773 0 |t International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems  |g vol. 18, no. 1 (Dec 2025), p. 297 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Computer Science Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3272862200/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3272862200/fulltext/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3272862200/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch