Analysis of setup errors and determination of planning target volume margins for thorax (lung, oesophagus and breast) cancers: From Regional Radiotherapy Centre, Kashmir (North India)

Guardado en:
書目詳細資料
發表在:Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering vol. 31, no. 2 (Jun 2025), p. 146-151
主要作者: Baba Ainain
其他作者: Sarkar Biplab, Bari Waseem
出版:
De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services
主題:
在線閱讀:Citation/Abstract
Full Text - PDF
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3273037135
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 1425-4689 
022 |a 1898-0309 
024 7 |a 10.2478/pjmpe-2025-0016  |2 doi 
035 |a 3273037135 
045 2 |b d20250601  |b d20250630 
084 |a 190934  |2 nlm 
100 1 |a Baba Ainain  |u Department of Physics , University of Kashmir , Jammu & Kashmir , India 
245 1 |a Analysis of setup errors and determination of planning target volume margins for thorax (lung, oesophagus and breast) cancers: From Regional Radiotherapy Centre, Kashmir (North India) 
260 |b De Gruyter Brill Sp. z o.o., Paradigm Publishing Services  |c Jun 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a The focus of this study was to determine the set-up errors so as to estimate the margin between the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) and the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and to suggest optimum margins for planning target volume (PTV) coverage in thorax cancers. In the present study data from 51 patients was incorporated. A total of 1308 portal images were examined. Set up errors were estimated by superimposing a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR), using an electronic portal image device (EPID) as a reference image. The Medio-Lateral (ML), Cranio-Caudal (CC), and Antero-Posterior (AP) directions were subsequently evaluated. According to the shifts obtained, systematic and random errors were computed. The van Herk formula was employed to determine the values for the clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins. The systematic error was found to be between 1.0 mm and 1.7 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.8 mm, and 2.1 mm and 3.1 mm along the x, y, and z axis. In the x, y, and z axis, the random error varied from 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm, 0.4 mm to 0.8 mm, and 0.7 mm to 1.7 mm, respectively. Based on the Van Herk equation, the PTV margin following our findings was estimated to be 4.7 mm, 3.3 mm, 8.8 mm for lung, 3.6 mm, 2.7 mm, and 5.7 mm for oesophagus, and 3.0 mm, 4.9 mm, and 8.6 mm for breast in the x, y, and z dimensions respectively. This study demonstrates that an 8.8 mm extension of CTV to PTV margin for the lung, 5.7 mm for the oesophagus, and 8.6 mm for the breast, serving as an upper limit, is sufficient to guarantee that 90% of patients diagnosed with thoracic cancers will receive a cumulative CTV dose that is at least 95% of the prescribed dose. 
653 |a Cancer 
653 |a Systematic errors 
653 |a Random errors 
653 |a Thorax 
653 |a Breast 
653 |a Lungs 
653 |a Radiation therapy 
653 |a Medical imaging 
700 1 |a Sarkar Biplab  |u Chief Medical Physicist, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals , Kolkata , India 
700 1 |a Bari Waseem  |u Department of Physics , University of Kashmir , Jammu & Kashmir , India 
773 0 |t Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering  |g vol. 31, no. 2 (Jun 2025), p. 146-151 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Health & Medical Collection 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3273037135/abstract/embedded/BH75TPHOCCPB476R?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3273037135/fulltextPDF/embedded/BH75TPHOCCPB476R?source=fedsrch