Urban Dimensions and Indicators for Smart Tourist Destinations from a State of the Art

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Argitaratua izan da:Urban Science vol. 9, no. 11 (2025), p. 471-499
Egile nagusia: Garcia, Thaís Siqueira
Beste egile batzuk: Tricárico Luciano Torres
Argitaratua:
MDPI AG
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:Citation/Abstract
Full Text + Graphics
Full Text - PDF
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!

MARC

LEADER 00000nab a2200000uu 4500
001 3275568576
003 UK-CbPIL
022 |a 2413-8851 
024 7 |a 10.3390/urbansci9110471  |2 doi 
035 |a 3275568576 
045 2 |b d20250101  |b d20251231 
100 1 |a Garcia, Thaís Siqueira 
245 1 |a Urban Dimensions and Indicators for Smart Tourist Destinations from a State of the Art 
260 |b MDPI AG  |c 2025 
513 |a Journal Article 
520 3 |a Smart Tourism Destinations (DTIs) represent innovative places established on the basis of an infrastructure of advanced technology, whose objective is to promote accessible, sustainable development for tourist regions to enrich tourist’s experiences and inhabitants’ quality of life. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to verify whether the phenomenon indicators of existing smart tourist destinations fit within all dimensions of a smart tourist destination. For data collection, the bibliographic survey method was used in renowned databases. Data analysis comprises two approaches, bibliometric and content analysis, applied sequentially. The results of the bibliometric analysis identify three main pillars in the current perspectives on DTIs: Management and Tourism Experience, Technology, and Sustainability, in addition, it revealed a duality between approaches from the Far East and Western Europe. The content analysis culminates in the proposition of two theoretical-conceptual models for the dimensions and indicators of DTIs, encompassing elements: Information and Communication Technologies (TICs), Governance, Innovation, Accessibility, Performance, Mobility and Infrastructure, as well as Segmented Sustainability in its economic, social, and environmental dimensions. However, the analysis highlights the lack of consensus among studies, especially DTI indicators. The results of the research highlight the insufficiency of these indicators for a comprehensive assessment, notably in the environmental dimension of sustainability. 
653 |a Sustainable development 
653 |a Databases 
653 |a Citations 
653 |a Tourist attractions 
653 |a Content analysis 
653 |a Quality of life 
653 |a Climate change 
653 |a COVID-19 
653 |a Infrastructure 
653 |a Smart cities 
653 |a Innovations 
653 |a Big Data 
653 |a Sustainability 
653 |a Hypotheses 
653 |a Conceptual models 
653 |a Medical research 
653 |a Sustainable tourism 
653 |a Information technology 
653 |a Governance 
653 |a Bibliometrics 
653 |a Data collection 
653 |a Mobile communication systems 
653 |a Data analysis 
653 |a Destinations 
653 |a Communications technology 
653 |a Tics 
653 |a Mobility 
653 |a Tourism 
653 |a Access 
653 |a Pandemics 
653 |a Social capital 
653 |a Literature reviews 
653 |a Qualitative research 
700 1 |a Tricárico Luciano Torres 
773 0 |t Urban Science  |g vol. 9, no. 11 (2025), p. 471-499 
786 0 |d ProQuest  |t Publicly Available Content Database 
856 4 1 |3 Citation/Abstract  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275568576/abstract/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text + Graphics  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275568576/fulltextwithgraphics/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch 
856 4 0 |3 Full Text - PDF  |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3275568576/fulltextPDF/embedded/7BTGNMKEMPT1V9Z2?source=fedsrch