How "Archive" Became a Verb
Guardado en:
| Publicado en: | Issues in Science and Technology vol. 42, no. 1 (Fall 2025), p. 65-69 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Publicado: |
Issues in Science and Technology
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Citation/Abstract Full Text Full Text - PDF |
| Etiquetas: |
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nab a2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 3276569871 | ||
| 003 | UK-CbPIL | ||
| 022 | |a 0748-5492 | ||
| 022 | |a 1938-1557 | ||
| 035 | |a 3276569871 | ||
| 045 | 2 | |b d20251001 |b d20251231 | |
| 084 | |a 13201 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Anonymous | |
| 245 | 1 | |a How "Archive" Became a Verb | |
| 260 | |b Issues in Science and Technology |c Fall 2025 | ||
| 513 | |a Feature | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Public concerns and expert testimony in the congressional hearings about networked computing and the potential for data abuse were perhaps overwrought. Orwellian visions from critics that predicted "1984 by 1970" were highly implausible. Numerous studies of government agencies' data operations commissioned around this time found that most did not have comprehensive information about data sources, storage locations, or formats. Most of these congressional hearings and subcommittee reports--including reports from federal agencies and the National Academy of Sciences--argued that the invasion of privacy and abuse of data banks were not inherent in the transition to computerized systems and automated recordkeeping. Still, many legal critics' predictions, as well as the public's concerns, turned out to be sounder than social scientists and data managers of the time believed. For decades, stakeholders inside and outside government lobbied for more information about the government's recordkeeping practices and data archives. Throughout the reports and rebuttals, experts and data specialists struggled to locate where the risks of accessing data in aggregate actually resided, and where safeguards should be placed in the data lifecycle to preserve privacy. | |
| 653 | |a Congressional hearings | ||
| 653 | |a Safeguards | ||
| 653 | |a Social scientists | ||
| 653 | |a Archives & records | ||
| 653 | |a Records management | ||
| 653 | |a Government agencies | ||
| 653 | |a Drug abuse | ||
| 653 | |a Right of privacy | ||
| 653 | |a Social sciences | ||
| 653 | |a Specialists | ||
| 653 | |a Privacy | ||
| 653 | |a Access to information | ||
| 653 | |a Software | ||
| 653 | |a Personal information | ||
| 653 | |a Aggregate data | ||
| 653 | |a Reports | ||
| 653 | |a Automation | ||
| 653 | |a Storage | ||
| 653 | |a Computer centers | ||
| 653 | |a Databases | ||
| 653 | |a Testimony | ||
| 653 | |a Computers | ||
| 653 | |a Confidentiality | ||
| 653 | |a Proposals | ||
| 653 | |a Bureaucrats | ||
| 653 | |a Banking | ||
| 653 | |a Computerization | ||
| 653 | |a Public interest | ||
| 653 | |a Data Collection | ||
| 653 | |a Researchers | ||
| 653 | |a Social Problems | ||
| 653 | |a Archives | ||
| 653 | |a Verbs | ||
| 653 | |a Hearings | ||
| 653 | |a Statistical Data | ||
| 653 | |a Recordkeeping | ||
| 653 | |a Social | ||
| 653 | |a Influence of Technology | ||
| 653 | |a Word Processing | ||
| 653 | |a Records (Forms) | ||
| 653 | |a Time | ||
| 653 | |a Laptop Computers | ||
| 653 | |a Federal Government | ||
| 653 | |a Public Agencies | ||
| 653 | |a Statistical Analysis | ||
| 653 | |a Data Processing | ||
| 653 | |a Scientists | ||
| 653 | |a Fear | ||
| 773 | 0 | |t Issues in Science and Technology |g vol. 42, no. 1 (Fall 2025), p. 65-69 | |
| 786 | 0 | |d ProQuest |t Science Database | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |3 Citation/Abstract |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3276569871/abstract/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3276569871/fulltext/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |3 Full Text - PDF |u https://www.proquest.com/docview/3276569871/fulltextPDF/embedded/75I98GEZK8WCJMPQ?source=fedsrch |